Performance of a machine learning model in recognition of normal tissue from histological sections
Sanyal, P.; Paul, S.; Das, A.
Show abstract
IntroductionMachine learning and artificial intelligence (AI) models have been applied in histopathology to solve specific problems like detection of metastasis in lymph nodes and immunohistochemical scoring. We have aimed to develop a machine learning model which can be trained in histopathology from the basics, i.e. identification of normal tissue. We have tried to replicate the process through which a human pathologist learns recognition of normal tissue from histological sections, and evaluate the performance of a machine learning model at this task. Materials and methodsA total of 658 histologic images were anonymised, microphotographed at 10x magnification, under the same condition of illumination, with a Magnus DC5 integrated microphotography system. The images were split into two subsets, training (386) and validation (272 images). The images belonged to seven classes of tissue: brain, intestine, kidney, liver, lungs, muscle and skin. Archived material of the hospital were used for the study. A machine learning model using convolutional neural network (CNN) was developed on the Keras platform, using the convolution layers of a pretrained VGG16 model. The model was trained with the training set of images over 10 epochs. After training, performance of the model was assessed on the validation set. ResultsThe model achieved 88.24% accuracy in classifying the images of the validation set. The most frequent errors were met in recognising images of kidney (14 errors, 33.33%). The commonest error was wrongly classifying kidney tissue as liver (07 errors). Analysis of the deeper layers of the neural network revealed specific patterns in images which were wrongly classified. ConclusionThe results of the present study indicates that a convolutional neural network might be trained in histology similar to a trainee pathologist. The study represents the first step towards developing a machine learning model as a generalised histopathological image classifier.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Demarcation line determination for diagnosis of gastric cancer disease range using unsupervised machine learning in magnifying narrow-band imaging 95%
- Passive Microwave Radiometry (MWR) for diagnostics of COVID-19 lung complications in Kyrgyzstan 94%
- Detection, Isolation and Quantification of Myocardial Infarct with Four Different Histological Staining Techniques 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction of high-risk liver cancer patients from their mutation profile: Benchmarking of mutation calling techniques 94%
- Deep Learning Enhances Detection of Extracapsular Extension in Prostate Cancer from mpMRI of 1001 Patients 90%
- Unpacking Unstructured Data: A Pilot Study on Extracting Insights from Neuropathological Reports of Parkinson's Disease Patients using Large Language Models 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.