Back

Self-sensitisation of Staphylococcus aureus to the antimicrobial factors found in human blood.

Douglas, E.; Brignoli, T.; Recker, M.; O'Brien, E.; McLoughlin, R.; Massey, R. C.

2021-07-19 microbiology
10.1101/2021.07.19.452914 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Introductory ParagraphFor opportunistic pathogens, the switch from a commensal to an invasive lifestyle is often considered an accidental event. But with plentiful opportunity, what leads one accidental event to result in an invasive infection, and another not to? And how much of this apparent stochasticity is driven by bacterial factors? To answer these questions, here we focussed on the major human pathogen Staphylococcus aureus, which can both reside asymptomatically as a member of our respiratory microbiome, or become invasive and cause infections as severe as bacteraemia. Survival upon exposure to the antibacterial factors found in serum is a critical aspect of their ability to cause bacteraemia, and across a collection of 300 clinical isolates we found there to be significant variability in this capability. Utilising a GWAS approach we have uncovered the genetic basis of much of this variability through the identification and functional verification of a number of new polymorphic loci that affect serum survival: tcaA, tarK, gntR, ilvC, arsB, yfhO, and pdhD. The expression of one of these genes, tcaA, was found to be induced upon exposure to serum, while simultaneously enhancing the sensitivity of S. aureus to serum through a process involving the ligation of wall teichoic acids into the cell wall. As blood-stage infections are a transmission dead-end for the bacteria, that S. aureus actively responds to serum to produce a protein which specifically limits their ability to survive in this environment demonstrates that the switch from the commensal to the invasive lifestyle is complex, and that TcaA may contribute to the long-term success of S. aureus by restricting the bacteria to their more readily transmissible commensal state.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.