Back

Natural immunity against COVID-19 significantly reduces the risk of reinfection: findings from a cohort of sero-survey participants

MISHRA, B. K.; Bhattacharya, D.; Kshatri, J. S.; Pati, S.

2021-07-19 infectious diseases
10.1101/2021.07.19.21260302 medRxiv
Show abstract

Conflicting reports on the persistence of antibody levels in individuals recovered from COVID-19 infection, suggest that the immunity against COVID-19 may not be lasting for long. In India, by 30th June, 2021, not less than 30 million people were infected with COVID-19 and 0.39 million people were reported to have lost their life to the disease in India. I the current study we followed up with a subsample of our previous sero-survey participants to assess whether natural immunity against SARS-CoV-2 was associated with a reduced risk of re-infection. We conducted telephonic interview of a total of 3038 participants, out of which 2238 participants responded and 5 participants were found to be not alive, as conveyed by their close relatives. There was a non-response rate of 26.1%. Out of the 2238 participants, 1170 were sero-positive and 1068 were sero-negative for antibody against COVID-19. Our survey found that only 3 individuals in the sero-positive group got infected with COVID-19 whereas 127 individuals reported contracting the infection the sero-negative group. Interestingly, from the 127 sero-negative individuals who later contracted COVID-19 infection, 30 needed hospitalization, out of which 12 were on oxygen therapy, four in ICU and one was on ventilator. At the other hand, from the 3 sero-positives re-infected with COVID-19, one had hospitalization, but didnnot require oxygen support or critical care. These findings reinforce the strong plausibility that development of antibody following natural infection not only protects against re-infection by the virus to a great extent, but also safeguards against progression to severe COVID-19 disease.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.