Back

Minimizing the ex vivo confounds of cell-isolation techniques on transcriptomic profiles of purified microglia

Ocanas, S. R.; Pham, K. D.; Blankenship, H. E.; Machalinski, A. H.; Chucair-Elliott, A. J.; Freeman, W. M.

2021-07-15 neuroscience
10.1101/2021.07.15.452509 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Modern molecular neuroscience studies require analysis of specific cellular populations derived from brain tissue samples to disambiguate cell-type specific events. This is particularly true in the analysis of minority glial populations in the brain, such as microglia, which may be obscured in whole tissue analyses. Microglia have central functions in development, aging, and neurodegeneration and are a current focus of neuroscience research. A long-standing concern for glial biologists using in vivo models is whether cell isolation from CNS tissue could introduce ex vivo artifacts in microglia, which respond quickly to changes in the environment. Mouse microglia were purified by magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS), as well as cytometer- and cartridge-based fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) approaches to compare and contrast performance. The Cx3cr1-NuTRAP mouse model was used here to provide an endogenous fluorescent microglial marker and a microglial-specific translatome profile as a baseline comparison lacking cell isolation artifacts. All methods performed similarly for microglial purity with main differences being in cell yield and time of isolation. Ex vivo activation signatures occurred principally during the initial tissue dissociation and cell preparation and not the microglial cell sorting. Utilizing transcriptional and translational inhibitors during the cell preparation prevented the activational phenotype. These data demonstrate that a variety of microglial isolation approaches can be used, depending on experimental needs, and that inhibitor cocktails are effective at reducing cell preparation artifacts. Table of Contents Image O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=97 SRC="FIGDIR/small/452509v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (19K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@823562org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@7edb25org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@656feeorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@197aae1_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG Main PointsMACS, cytometer-FACS, and cartridge-FACS give equivalent and sufficient yield/purity for microglial analyses. Ex vivo microglial activation is prevented by supplementation with transcription/translation inhibitors during cell preparation.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.3%
2
Journal of Neurochemistry
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
3
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.3%
4
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
79 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Journal of Neuroscience Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
7
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
Glia
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
9
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
10
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
11
Journal of Neuroinflammation
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
50% of probability mass above
12
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 51%
2.0%
14
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.9%
15
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
16
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
17
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
19
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.6%
20
ASN Neuro
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
21
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
22
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
23
npj Parkinson's Disease
89 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
24
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
25
Molecular Brain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
26
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
27
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
28
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Molecular Neurobiology
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%