Back

Gut microbiome dysbiosis during COVID-19 is associated with increased risk for bacteremia and microbial translocation.

Venzon, M.; Bernard-Raichon, L.; Klein, J.; Axelrad, J. E.; Hussey, G. A.; Sullivan, A. P.; Cassanovas-Massana, A.; Noval, M. G.; Valero-Jimenez, A. M.; Gago, J.; Wilder, E.; Yale IMPACT Research Team, ; Thorpe, L. E.; Littman, D. R.; Dittmann, M.; Stapleford, K. A.; Shopsin, B.; Torres, V. J.; Ko, A. I.; Iwasaki, A.; Cadwell, K.; Schluter, J.

2021-07-15 microbiology
10.1101/2021.07.15.452246 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The microbial populations in the gut microbiome have recently been associated with COVID-19 disease severity. However, a causal impact of the gut microbiome on COVID-19 patient health has not been established. Here we provide evidence that gut microbiome dysbiosis is associated with translocation of bacteria into the blood during COVID-19, causing life-threatening secondary infections. Antibiotics and other treatments during COVID-19 can potentially confound microbiome associations. We therefore first demonstrate in a mouse model that SARS-CoV-2 infection can induce gut microbiome dysbiosis, which correlated with alterations to Paneth cells and goblet cells, and markers of barrier permeability. Comparison with stool samples collected from 96 COVID-19 patients at two different clinical sites also revealed substantial gut microbiome dysbiosis, paralleling our observations in the animal model. Specifically, we observed blooms of opportunistic pathogenic bacterial genera known to include antimicrobial-resistant species in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Analysis of blood culture results testing for secondary microbial bloodstream infections with paired microbiome data obtained from these patients indicates that bacteria may translocate from the gut into the systemic circulation of COVID-19 patients. These results are consistent with a direct role for gut microbiome dysbiosis in enabling dangerous secondary infections during COVID-19.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.