Understanding Adverse Population Sentiment Towards the Spread of COVID-19 in the United States
Hohl, A.; Choi, M.; Medina, R.; Wan, N.; Wen, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundDuring the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the immediate threat of illness and mortality is not the only concern. In the United States, COVID-19 is not only causing physical suffering to patients, but also great levels of adverse sentiment (e.g., fear, panic, anxiety) among the public. Such secondary threats can be anticipated and explained through sentiment analysis of social media, such as Twitter. MethodsWe obtained a dataset of geotagged tweets on the topic of COVID-19 in the contiguous United States during the period of 11/1/2019 - 9/15/2020. We classified each tweet into "adverse" and "non-adverse" using the NRC Emotion Lexicon and tallied up the counts for each category per county per day. We utilized the space-time scan statistic to find clusters and a three-stage regression approach to identify socioeconomic and demographic correlates of adverse sentiment. ResultsWe identified substantial spatiotemporal variation in adverse sentiment in our study area/period. After an initial period of low-level adverse sentiment (11/1/2019 - 1/15/2020), we observed a steep increase and subsequent fluctuation at a higher level (1/16/2020 - 9/15/2020). The number of daily tweets was low initially (11/1/2019 - 1/22/2020), followed by spikes and subsequent decreases until the end of the study period. The space-time scan statistic identified 12 clusters of adverse sentiment of varying size, location, and strength. Clusters were generally active during the time period of late March to May/June 2020. Increased adverse sentiment was associated with decreased racial/ethnic heterogeneity, decreased rurality, higher vulnerability in terms of minority status and language, and housing type and transportation. ConclusionsWe utilized a dataset of geotagged tweets to identify the spatiotemporal patterns and the spatial correlates of adverse population sentiment during the first two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. The characteristics of areas with high adverse sentiment may be relevant for communication of containment measures. The combination of spatial clustering and regression can be beneficial for understanding of the ramifications of COVID-19, as well as disease outbreaks in general.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Fear of Infection and Sufficient Vaccine Reservation Information Might Drive Rapid Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination in Japan: Evidence from Twitter Analysis 93%
- Users’ Reactions on Announced Vaccines against COVID-19 Before Marketing in France: Analysis of Twitter posts 92%
- Developing an automatic system for classifying chatter about health services from Twitter: A case study for Medicaid 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Comprehensive County Level Framework to Identify Factors Affecting Hospital Capacity and Predict Future Hospital Demand 95%
- Can tracking mobility be used as a public health tool against COVID-19 following the expiration of stay-at-home mandates? 94%
- Assessing the Impact of Human Mobility to Predict Regional Excess Death in Ecuador 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Multivariate Forecasting Model for the COVID-19 Hospital Census Based on Local Infection Incidence 94%
- Isolation Considered Epidemiological Model for the Prediction of COVID-19 Trend in Tokyo, Japan 91%
- Dying From COVID-19 or With COVID-19: A Definitive Answer Through a Retrospective Analysis of Mortality in Italy 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Temporal Geospatial Analysis of COVID-19 Pre-infection Determinants of Risk in South Carolina 95%
- The Role of Societal Aspects in the Formation of Official COVID-19 Reports: A Data-Driven Analysis 94%
- Associations Between Google Search Trends for Symptoms and COVID-19 Confirmed and Death Cases in the United States 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.