Back

Understanding Adverse Population Sentiment Towards the Spread of COVID-19 in the United States

Hohl, A.; Choi, M.; Medina, R.; Wan, N.; Wen, M.

2021-07-19 public and global health
10.1101/2021.07.15.21260543 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDuring the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the immediate threat of illness and mortality is not the only concern. In the United States, COVID-19 is not only causing physical suffering to patients, but also great levels of adverse sentiment (e.g., fear, panic, anxiety) among the public. Such secondary threats can be anticipated and explained through sentiment analysis of social media, such as Twitter. MethodsWe obtained a dataset of geotagged tweets on the topic of COVID-19 in the contiguous United States during the period of 11/1/2019 - 9/15/2020. We classified each tweet into "adverse" and "non-adverse" using the NRC Emotion Lexicon and tallied up the counts for each category per county per day. We utilized the space-time scan statistic to find clusters and a three-stage regression approach to identify socioeconomic and demographic correlates of adverse sentiment. ResultsWe identified substantial spatiotemporal variation in adverse sentiment in our study area/period. After an initial period of low-level adverse sentiment (11/1/2019 - 1/15/2020), we observed a steep increase and subsequent fluctuation at a higher level (1/16/2020 - 9/15/2020). The number of daily tweets was low initially (11/1/2019 - 1/22/2020), followed by spikes and subsequent decreases until the end of the study period. The space-time scan statistic identified 12 clusters of adverse sentiment of varying size, location, and strength. Clusters were generally active during the time period of late March to May/June 2020. Increased adverse sentiment was associated with decreased racial/ethnic heterogeneity, decreased rurality, higher vulnerability in terms of minority status and language, and housing type and transportation. ConclusionsWe utilized a dataset of geotagged tweets to identify the spatiotemporal patterns and the spatial correlates of adverse population sentiment during the first two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. The characteristics of areas with high adverse sentiment may be relevant for communication of containment measures. The combination of spatial clustering and regression can be beneficial for understanding of the ramifications of COVID-19, as well as disease outbreaks in general.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.6%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.8%
3
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.2%
4
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
7
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
8
GeoHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
9
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
11
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
12
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
13
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
14
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
15
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
16
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
17
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Health Science Reports
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
21
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
24
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%