Back

Predation Efficiency upon Clinical Isolates: Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus is Prey Specific and Origin Dependent

Herencias, C.; Saralegui, C.; Halperin, A.; Caballero, J. d. D.; Perez-Viso, B.; Salgado-Briegas, S.; Fernandez-Lanza, V.; Canton, R.; Baquero, F.; Prieto, A.; del Campo, R.

2021-07-15 ecology
10.1101/2021.07.13.452292 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The use of predatory bacteria as live antibiotics has been proposed for managing bacterial infections, especially for those caused by antibiotic multiresistant isolates for which there are few therapeutic options. However, the current knowledge in this field is scarce, with most of the available data based on environmental isolates, with a significant lack of human clinical samples. In this study, we evaluated the predatory spectrum of the reference strain Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus 109J on 13 Serratia marcescens (5 of which were carbapenemase producers) and 78 Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates from respiratory (colonizing the lungs of patients with cystic fibrosis) or bacteremic infections, differentiated by phenotype (mucoid or not), antibiotic resistance phenotype (including multidrug-resistant isolates), and genetic lineage (frequent and rare sequence types). The source of the isolates was significantly associated with predation efficiency (100% for S. marcescens, 67% for P. aeruginosa from cystic fibrosis, and 25% for P. aeruginosa from bacteremia). In contrast, no correlation with colonial morphotype, genetic background, or antibiotic susceptibility was found. To evaluate the influence of the predator on the predation event, we employed a more aggressive B. bacteriovorus mutant 109J preying upon the same 48 bacteremic P. aeruginosa isolates. The mutants predation efficiency was higher than that of their wild-type counterpart (43% vs. 25%), pointing out that predation is specific to each prey-predator pair of isolates. Our results provide the most extensive study of clinical prey susceptibility published to date and show that the prey-predator interaction is influenced by the origin of the isolates rather than by their genetic background or their antibiotic susceptibility phenotype. IMPORTANCEThe potential usefulness of predatory bacteria in controlling human pathogens, particularly those that are multiresistant to antibiotics, is enormous. Although this possibility has long been suggested, there are still no data on predation susceptibility in clinical strains, and the possible presence of autochthonous predators of the human microbiota has not been investigated. In this study, we employed a reference predator with an environmental origin to study predation phenomena in 3 well-characterized collections of human clinical isolates. Our results demonstrated that predation is a specific consequence of each prey-predator interaction, with the origin of the strains the most relevant factor. In contrast, the genetic background, morphotype, and antibiotic resistance did not appear to influence the predation phenomenon. We also highlight the involvement of a putative polyhydroxyalkanoate depolymerase protein of B. bacteriovorus in determining prey susceptibility. To our knowledge, this study is the largest performed with strains of clinical origin, discriminating between various genera and including strains with multiresistance to antibiotics.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
14.1%
2
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
3
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
4
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.9%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
7
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
8
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
9
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
10
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
11
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
12
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.5%
13
MicrobiologyOpen
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
14
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.0%
15
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.3%
16
Current Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
17
Microbial Ecology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
18
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
19
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
20
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
21
Animal Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
22
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Journal of Applied Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
25
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
26
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
27
Gut Microbes
70 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
28
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
29
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%