Back

A CLEM approach to access to the ultrastructure at the graft interface in Arabidopsis thaliana

Chambaud, C.; Cookson, S. J.; Ollat, N.; Bayer, E. M. F.; Brocard, L.

2021-07-15 plant biology
10.1101/2021.07.13.452258 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Despite recent progress in our understanding of the graft union formation, we still know little about the cellular events underlying the grafting process. This is partially due to the difficulty of reliably targeting the graft interface in electron microscopy to study its ultrastructure and three-dimensional architecture. To overcome this technological bottleneck, we developed a correlative light electron microscopy approach (CLEM) to study the graft interface with high ultrastructural resolution. Grafting hypocotyls of Arabidopsis thaliana lines expressing YFP or mRFP in the endoplasmic reticulum allowed the efficient targeting of the grafting interface for under light and electron microscopy. To explore the potential of our method to study sub-cellular events at the graft interface, we focused on the formation of secondary plasmodesmata (PD) between the grafted partners. We showed that 4 classes of PD were formed at the interface and that PD introgression into the call wall was initiated equally by both partners. Moreover, the success of PD formation appeared not systematic with a third of PD not spanning the cell wall entirely. Characterizing the ultrastructural characteristics of these failed PD gives us insights into the process of secondary PD biogenesis. We showed that the thinning of the cell wall and the endoplasmic reticulum-plasma membrane tethering seem to be required for the establishment of symplastic connections between the scion and the rootstock. The resolution reached in this work shows that our CLEM method offer a new scale to the study for biological processes requiring the combination of light and electron microscopy.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.2%
2
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.4%
3
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.0%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
6
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
7
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.0%
8
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.3%
9
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
10
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
11
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
15
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
18
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
19
Quantitative Plant Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
20
Physiologia Plantarum
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
22
Plant Molecular Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
23
Plant And Cell Physiology
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
25
Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
26
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%