Consistent coordination patterns provide near perfect behavior decoding in a comprehensive motor program for insect flight
Putney, J.; Angjelichinoski, M.; Ravier, R.; Ferrari, S.; Tarokh, V.; Sponberg, S.
Show abstract
Patterns of motor activity can be used to decode behavior state. Precise spike timing encoding is present in many motor systems, but is not frequently utilized to decode behavior or to examine how coordination is achieved across many motor units. Testing whether the same coordinated sets of muscles control different movements is difficult without a complete motor representation at the level of the currency of control - action potentials. Here, we demonstrate nearly perfect decoding of six hawk moth flight behaviors elicited in response to wide-field drifting visual stimuli about the flight axes - pitch, roll, and yaw - using a comprehensive, spike-resolved motor program and a simple linear decoding pipeline. A complex decoding scheme is not necessary, even if the functional patterns of control are nonlinear. We show that muscle covariation present in one pair of visual stimulus conditions can be used to decode behavior in a different pair of visual stimulus conditions, indicating the presence of conserved muscle coordination patterns at the level of motor neuronal timings in functionally distinct behaviors. We also demonstrate that as few as half the muscles can be used to retain decoding performance, linking coordination to redundancy in encoding, if not function, across the entire moth flight motor program.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An information theoretic method to resolve millisecond-scale spike timing precision in a comprehensive motor program 96%
- Applying Super-Resolution and Tomography Concepts to Identify Receptive Field Subunits in the Retina 94%
- Wing structure and neural encoding jointly determine sensing strategies in insect flight 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.