Prevalence of Strabismus in Individuals on the Autism Spectrum: A Meta-analysis
Williams, Z. J.
Show abstract
Background and ObjectivesStrabismus, a misalignment of the eyes, is an important risk factor for amblyopia and visual impairment in the pediatric population. Several studies have reported an increased likelihood of strabismus in persons on the autism spectrum, but prevalence estimates in this group vary greatly. MethodsWe searched multiple databases to identify peer-reviewed articles published in English through November 1, 2020 that provided estimates of strabismus prevalence in autistic individuals. Prevalence estimates were synthesized using Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis, and sensitivity analysis was also performed using only the subset of studies that recruited participants from non-ophthalmologic settings and identified strabismus using structured ocular exams. Bayesian meta-regression was used to assess potential moderators of prevalence across studies. ResultsA total of 151 nonduplicate articles were screened, of which 22 were included in the meta-analysis (k=28 samples, nAUT=113,227). The meta-analytic point prevalence of strabismus in autistic individuals was 13.4% (95% CrI [8.3,19.4]), and sensitivity analysis produced a very similar estimate (14.0% [7.0,22.0], nAUT=581). Esotropia was the predominant subtype of strabismus reported, accounting for approximately 55% of cases. Reported prevalence rates were higher in younger samples (BF10=13.43, R2Het =0.273) and samples recruited from optometry/ophthalmology clinics (BF10=11.47, R2Het =0.238). ConclusionThis meta-analysis found a high prevalence of strabismus in autistic individuals, with rates 3-10 times that of the general population. As untreated strabismus is a major risk factor for amblyopia in young children, these findings underscore the importance of timely screening and assessment of ocular problems in persons on the autism spectrum. Whats Known on This SubjectStrabismus has been reported to be more prevalent in individuals on the autism spectrum, but estimates have been very imprecise, ranging from 3-84% across studies. What This Study AddsThis study performs the first quantitative synthesis of strabismus prevalence in over 100,000 autistic individuals, generating more precise estimates of the prevalence of strabismus in the autistic population. Factors contributing to the large differences between studies are also examined using meta-regression.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ophthalmic Manifestations of NAA10-Related and NAA15-Related Neurodevelopmental Syndrome: Analysis of Cortical Visual Impairment and Refractive Errors 92%
- Ocular Manifestations in a Cohort of 43 Patients with KBG Syndrome 91%
- Systematic Description of 3q29 Duplication Syndrome Reveals New Syndromic Phenotypes: Results from the 3q29 Registry 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical description, molecular delineation and genotype-phenotype correlation in 340 patients with KBG syndrome: Addition of 67 new patients 90%
- Cerebral Visual Impairment: genetic diagnoses and phenotypic associations 88%
- EyeG2P: an automated variant filtering approach improves efficiency of diagnostic genomic testing for inherited ophthalmic disorders 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of visual impairment on balance and visual processing functions in students with special educational needs 91%
- Study protocol for the EYEdentify project: An examination of gaze behaviour in autistic adults using a virtual reality-based paradigm 90%
- Neural Correlates of Eye Contact and Social Function in Autism Spectrum Disorder 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of three bioinformatics tools in the detection of ASD candidate variants from whole exome sequencing data 89%
- Functional connectivity in infants' visual cortex: Links to motion processing and autism 88%
- Individuals with clinically relevant autistic traits tend to have an eye for detail 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.