Back

The retrotransposon R2 maintains Drosophila ribosomal DNA repeats

Nelson, J. O.; Slicko, A.; Yamashita, Y. M.

2021-07-12 cell biology
10.1101/2021.07.12.451825 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Ribosomal DNA (rDNA) loci contain the hundreds of tandemly repeated copies of ribosomal RNA genes needed to support cellular viability. This repetitiveness makes it highly susceptible to copy number (CN) loss, threatening multi-generational maintenance of rDNA. How this threat is counteracted to avoid extinction of the lineage has remained unclear. Here, we show that the rDNA-specific retrotransposon R2 is essential for rDNA CN maintenance in the Drosophila male germline, despite the perceived disruptive nature of transposable elements. Depletion of R2 led to defective rDNA CN maintenance, causing a decline in fecundity over generations and eventual extinction. This study reveals that active retrotransposons can provide a benefit to their hosts, contrary to their reputation as genomic parasites, which may contribute to their widespread success throughout taxa. One Sentence SummaryThe retrotransposon R2 initiates restoration of ribosomal DNA copies to trans-generationally maintain essential locus.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
18.8%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Science
● 477 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.8%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Science Advances
● 1243 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.0%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 23%
6.8%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
5
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.8%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Nature Cell Biology
○ 118 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.4%
7
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.4%
8
Nature
○ 645 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.3%
9
Cell Reports
○ 1498 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.3%
10
Developmental Cell
○ 196 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
11
Molecular Cell
○ 350 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
12
PLOS Genetics
● 862 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.8%
13
Current Biology
○ 665 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
14
Cell
○ 431 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
15
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
236 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
16
mBio
● 833 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.0%
17
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.9%
18
The EMBO Journal
○ 309 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
Genome Biology
○ 637 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
20
Immunity
○ 67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.