Implications of trade network structure and population dynamics for food security and equality
Fair, K. R.; Bauch, C.; Anand, M.
Show abstract
Given trades importance to maintaining food security, it is crucial to understand the relationship between human population growth, land use, food supply, and trade. We develop a metapopulation model coupling human population dynamics to agricultural land use and food production in "patches" (regions and countries) connected via trade networks. Patches that import sparingly or fail to adjust their demand sharply in response to changes in food per capita experience food insecurity. They fall into a feedback loop between increasing population growth and decreasing food per capita, particularly if they are peripheral to the network. A displacement effect is also evident; patches that are more central and/or import more heavily preserve their natural land states. Their reliance on imports means other patches must expand their agricultural land. These results emphasize that strategies for improving food security and equality must account for the combined effects of network topology and patch-level characteristics.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Energy-ordered resource stratification as an agnostic signature of life 95%
- The evolution of trait variance creates a tension between species diversity and functional diversity 94%
- Landscape heterogeneity buffers biodiversity of meta-food-webs under global change through rescue and drainage effects 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Population structure across scales facilitates coexistence and spatial heterogeneity of antibiotic-resistant infections 96%
- Biodiversity is enhanced by sequential resource utilization and environmental fluctuations via emergent temporal niches 95%
- Positive interactions within and between populations decrease the likelihood of evolutionary rescue 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.