Rapid evolution of the functionally conserved gap gene giant in Drosophila
Chang, W.; Matute, D. R.; Kreitman, M.
Show abstract
Developmental processes in multicellular organisms, and the outcomes they produce, are often evolutionarily conserved. Yet phylogenetic conservation of developmental outcomes is not reflected in functional preservation of the genes regulating these processes, a phenomenon referred to as developmental system drift (1, 2). Little is known about the evolutionary forces producing change in the molecular details of regulatory genes and their networks while preserving development outcomes. Here we address this void in knowledge by systematically swapping the Drosophila melanogaster coding and noncoding regions of the essential gap gene, giant, a key regulator of embryonic pattern formation, with orthologous sequences drawn from both closely and distantly related species within the genus. Employing sensitized genetic complementation assays, the loss of a transgenes ability to restore viability occurs across phylogeny at every interspecific level of comparison and includes both coding and noncoding changes. Epistasis is present as well -- both between coding and noncoding sequences and, in a dramatic example of change-of-sign epistasis, between the only two coding substitutions separating two very closely related species. A continuous process of functional divergence hidden under conserved phylotypic developmental outcomes requires reconsideration of the prevailing view that the essential genes in conserved regulatory networks are protected from the driving forces of evolutionary change.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A genetic switch for male UV-iridescence in an incipient species pair of sulphur butterflies 98%
- Genomic basis of parallel adaptation varies with divergence in Arabidopsis and its relatives 96%
- Standing genetic variation and chromosome differences drove rapid ecotype formation in a major malaria vector 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.