Nonstoichiometric balanced complexes: Implications on the effective deficiency of the underlying metabolic network
Langary, D.; Kueken, A.; Nikoloski, Z.
Show abstract
The deficiency of a (bio)chemical reaction network can be conceptually interpreted as a measure of its ability to support exotic dynamical behavior and/or multistationarity. The classical definition of deficiency relates to the capacity of a network to permit variations of the complex formation rate vector at steady state, irrespective of the network kinetics. However, the deficiency is by definition completely insensitive to the fine details of the directionality of reactions as well as bounds on reaction fluxes. While the classical definition of deficiency can be readily applied in the analysis of unconstrained, weakly reversible networks, it only provides an upper bound in the cases where relevant constraints on reaction fluxes are imposed. Here we propose the concept of effective deficiency, which provides a more accurate assessment of the networks capacity to permit steady state variations at the complex level for constrained networks of any reversibility patterns. The effective deficiency relies on the concept of nonstoichiometric balanced complexes, which we have already shown to be present in real-world biochemical networks operating under flux constraints. Our results demonstrate that the effective deficiency of real-world biochemical networks is smaller than the classical deficiency, indicating the effects of reaction directionality and flux bounds on the variation of the complex formation rate vector at steady state.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Large-scale mRNA translation and the intricate effects of competition for the finite pool of ribosomes 97%
- Modularity of biological systems: a link between structure and function 97%
- Efficient Manipulation and Generation of Kirchhoff Polynomials for the Analysis of Non-equilibrium Biochemical Reaction Networks 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.