Back

Topology and habitat assortativity drive neutral and adaptive diversification in spatial graphs

Boussange, V.; Pellissier, L.

2021-07-08 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2021.07.06.451404 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Biodiversity results from differentiation mechanisms developing within biological populations. Such mechanisms are influenced by the properties of the landscape over which individuals interact, disperse and evolve. Notably, landscape connectivity and habitat heterogeneity constrain the movement and survival of individuals, thereby promoting differentiation through drift and local adaptation. Nevertheless, the complexity of landscape features can blur our understanding of how they drive differentiation. Here, we formulate a stochastic, eco-evolutionary model where individuals are structured over a graph that captures complex connectivity patterns and accounts for habitat heterogeneity. Individuals possess neutral and adaptive traits, whose divergence results in differentiation at the population level. The modelling framework enables an analytical underpinning of emerging macroscopic properties, which we complement with numerical simulations to investigate how the graph topology and the spatial habitat distribution affect differentiation. We show that in the absence of selection, graphs with high characteristic length and high heterogeneity in degree promote neutral differentiation. Habitat assortativity, a metric that captures habitat spatial autocorrelation in graphs, additionally drives differentiation patterns under habitat-dependent selection. While assortativity systematically amplifies adaptive differentiation, it can foster or depress neutral differentiation depending on the migration regime. By formalising the eco-evolutionary and spatial dynamics of biological populations in complex landscapes, our study establishes the link between landscape features and the emergence of diversification, contributing to a fundamental understanding of the origin of biodiversity gradients. Significance statementIt is not clear how landscape connectivity and habitat heterogeneity influence differentiation in biological populations. To obtain a mechanistic understanding of underlying processes, we construct an individualbased model that accounts for eco-evolutionary and spatial dynamics over graphs. Individuals possess both neutral and adaptive traits, whose co-evolution results in differentiation at the population level. In agreement with empirical studies, we show that characteristic length, heterogeneity in degree and habitat assortativity drive differentiation. By using analytical tools that permit a macroscopic description of the dynamics, we further link differentiation patterns to the mechanisms that generate them. Our study provides support for a mechanistic understanding of how landscape features affect diversification.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
25.5%
2
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.0%
3
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.3%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 8%
8.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.3%
6
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.3%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.5%
8
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 26%
3.5%
10
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.3%
11
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
13
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
15
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
16
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
17
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
18
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
20
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%