Does prior healthcare experience predict success on clinical courses and add value to admissions processes?
Gray, J. T.; Darling-Pomranz, C.; Spencer, D.
Show abstract
ObjectivesThis work sought to assess whether prior clinical experience provided any guide to likely course achievement from three completed cohorts of Physician Associates at the University of Sheffield. MethodsSixty students who entered the PA course at TUoS since it began in 2016 were included in the study. Each students original course application was reviewed for healthcare experience and mapped against first sit examination scores. Statistical analysis was undertaken with a two-tailed t-test. ResultsNo correlation was found between previous healthcare experience and performance in examinations. Students with previous healthcare experience performed slightly worse than those without in the OSCE examination but not at a level of statistical significance. ConclusionsThe use of clinical experience as part of the criteria of entry does not predict success on a Physician Associate course. We support the position of the 2010 Ottawa conference that quality assured methodologies along with objective cut offs for previous academic attainment are the most appropriate way to select students for clinical courses.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- COVIDReady2 Study Protocol: Cross-sectional Survey of Medical Student Volunteering and Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United Kingdom 95%
- Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: Evaluation of a blended learning approach 94%
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Introducing the 4Ps Model of Transitioning to Distance Learning: a convergent mixed methods study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- A national professional development program fills mentoring gaps for postdoctoral researchers 94%
- Impacts of lack of pocket money on undergraduate students' clinical learning activities 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating a first fully automated interview grounded in Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) methodology: results from a feasibility study 94%
- Calculated grades, predicted grades, forecasted grades and actual A-level grades: Reliability, correlations and predictive validity in medical school applicants, undergraduates, and postgraduates in a time of COVID-19 93%
- Conceptualizing centers of excellence: A global evidence 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Balancing Act of Academic Clinical Fellows in UK Emergency Medicine: A Qualitative Study 92%
- Variation in ambulance pre-alert process and practice: Cross-sectional survey of ambulance clinicians 90%
- Diversity of CPR manikins for basic life support education: Use of manikin sex, race, and body shape – A scoping review 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Self-Directed Learning Activities at King Abdulaziz University: A Qualitative Study of Faculty Perceptions 94%
- Navigating the Crisis: A Cross-sectional Survey Analysis of Resident Doctors' Experiences of Specialty Training and Employment in Today's NHS 92%
- Validation of the patient reported outcome measures tool “Catquest” in Odia language 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.