Back

Individualized prediction of future cognition using baseline developmental changes in cortical anatomy

Khundrakpam, B.; Booij, L.; Jeon, S.; Tohka, J.; Evans, A. C.

2021-07-06 neuroscience
10.1101/2021.07.05.451172 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Predictive modeling studies have started to reveal brain measures underlying cognition; however, most studies are based on cross-sectional data (static final brain measures acquired at one time point). Since brain development comprises of continuously ongoing events leading to cognitive development, predictive modeling studies need to consider dynamic as opposed to static final brain measures. Using longitudinal neuroimaging and cognitive data (global executive composite score, an index of executive function) from 82 individuals (aged 5-14 years, scanned 3 times), we built highly accurate prediction models (r=0.61, p=1.6e-09) of future cognition (assessed at visit 3) based on baseline developmental changes in cortical anatomy (from visit 1 to 2). More importantly, dynamic brain measures (change in cortical anatomy from visit 1 to 2) and not static brain measures (cortical anatomy at visit 1 and 2) were critical for predicting future cognition, suggesting the need for considering dynamic brain measures in predicting cognitive outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 16%
11.9%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.8%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Cerebral Cortex
◐ 396 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.9%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Translational Psychiatry
○ 260 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
7.3%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
○ 96 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
6
NeuroImage
○ 903 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.7%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
7
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
○ 71 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.5%
8
Molecular Psychiatry
○ 282 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
Human Brain Mapping
○ 329 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
10
NeuroImage: Clinical
○ 144 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
11
Frontiers in Psychiatry
○ 87 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
Biological Psychiatry
○ 137 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
○ 77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
NeuroImage: Reports
○ 29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.3%
17
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
18
Brain, Behavior, & Immunity - Health
○ 28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Neuroscience
○ 256 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
20
Biology of Sex Differences
○ 32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
21
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
○ 60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
○ 74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
23
Imaging Neuroscience
● 282 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
24
The Cerebellum
○ 17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
25
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.0%
26
Brain Communications
◐ 166 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.