Back

Phenotypic Characterization Of Two Novel Cell Line Models Of Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Haffner, M. C.; Bhamidipati, A.; Tsai, H. K.; Esopi, D. M.; Vaghasia, A. M.; Low, J.-Y.; Patel, R. A.; Guner, G.; Pham, M.-T.; Castagna, N.; Hicks, J.; Wyhs, N.; Aebersold, R.; De Marzo, A. M.; Nelson, W. G.; Guo, T.; Yegnasubramanian, S.

2021-07-05 cancer biology
10.1101/2021.07.04.450352 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUNDResistance to androgen deprivation therapies is a major driver of mortality in advanced prostate cancer. Therefore, there is a need to develop new pre-clinical models that allow the investigation of resistance mechanisms and the assessment of drugs for the treatment of castration resistant prostate cancer. METHODSWe generated two novel cell line models (LAPC4-CR and VCaP-CR) which were derived by passaging LAPC4 and VCaP cells in vivo and in vitro under castrate conditions. We performed detailed transcriptomic (RNA-seq) and proteomic analyses (SWATH-MS) to delineate expression differences between castration-sensitive and castration-resistant cell lines. Furthermore, we characterized the in vivo and in vitro growth characteristics of the novel cell line models. RESULTSThe two cell line derivatives LAPC4-CR and VCaP-CR showed castration resistant growth in vitro and in vivo which was only minimally inhibited by AR antagonists, enzalutamide and bicalutamide. High-dose androgen treatment resulted in significant growth arrest of VCaP-CR but not in LAPC4-CR cells. Both cell lines maintained AR expression, but exhibited distinct expression changes on the mRNA and protein level. Integrated analyses including data from LNCaP and the previously described castration resistant LNCaP-abl cells revealed an expression signature of castration resistance. CONCLUSIONSThe two novel cell line models LAPC4-CR and VCaP-CR and their comprehensive characterization on the RNA and protein level represent important resources to study the molecular mechanisms of castration resistance.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Prostate
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
2
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.3%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.6%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
5
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
6
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
8
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
9
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
10
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
11
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Neoplasia
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.3%
16
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
17
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
18
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
19
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
21
Oncogene
76 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
24
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
25
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
26
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
Molecular Cancer Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
28
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%