Assessing our capability to predict the presence of respiratory diseases at the age of four using data available at one month of age
Han, X.; Gray, L. E. K.; Mahar, R. K.; Carlin, J. B.; Ranganathan, S.; Vuillermin, P. J.; Vukcevic, D.; Barwon Infant Study (BIS) Investigator Team,
Show abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWChronic respiratory diseases are often difficult to cure and are likely to originate early in life. Therefore, early identification of such diseases is of interest for early prevention. We explored the potential to predict these almost from birth; using data at 1 month of age, we attempted to predict disease occurrence 4 years later in life. Our data came from the Barwon Infant Study; after cleaning and processing, we had measurements on 41 variables from 401 participants. We considered three respiratory diseases: asthma, wheeze and hay fever. As predictors, we used a variety of information that would be available in a clinical setting. Of particular interest to our investigation was whether lung function measurements (newly available at such an early age) would helpfully improve predictive accuracy. We also investigated whether maternal smoking (previously associated with respiratory illnesses) is a helpful predictor. Our methods included logistic regression as the main model, multiple imputation to deal with missing values, stepwise selection and LASSO to select variables, and cross-validation to assess performance. We measured predictive performance using AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve), sensitivity and specificity. Broadly, we found that the best models had only modest predictive power for each disease. For example, for asthma we achieved an AUC of 0.67, a sensitivity of 68% and a corresponding specificity of 63%. Performance for the other two diseases was similar. We also found that our lung function measurements did not improve predictive performance; some-what surprisingly, this was also true for maternal smoking. The most useful predictors included, among others, family history of these diseases and variables relating to the size of the infants. Given the modest performance of these models, our findings suggest that very early prediction of respiratory illnesses is still a challenging task.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of a Conceptual Model of Childhood Asthma to Inform Asthma Prevention Policies 91%
- Risk factors for asthma-related hospital and intensive care admissions in children, adolescents, and adults: a cohort study using primary and secondary care data 90%
- The Association of Alpha Globin Gene Copy Number with Exhaled Nitric Oxide in a Cross-sectional Study of Healthy Black Adults 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- More complaints than findings - Long-term pulmonary function in children and adolescents after COVID-19 91%
- Clinical hypoxemia score for outpatient child pneumonia care lacking pulse oximetry in Africa and South Asia 89%
- External Validation of Predictive Models for Diagnosis, Management and Severity of Pediatric Appendicitis 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Source terms for benchmarking models of SARS-CoV-2 transmission via aerosols and droplets 90%
- A novel approach for evaluating contact patterns and risk mitigation strategies for COVID-19 in English Primary Schools with application of Structured Expert Judgement 89%
- COVID-19 attack ratio among children critically depends on the time to removal and activity levels 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Anatomic development of the upper airway during the first five years of life: A three-dimensional imaging study 92%
- Oral feeding with probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus attenuates cigarette smoke-induced COPD in C57Bl/6 mice: Relevance to inflammatory markers in human bronchial epithelial cells 92%
- Quality Of Life, Salivary Cortisol And Atopic Diseases In Young Children 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.