Anticoagulants and Antiplatelets in COVID-19: Impact on Survival and Thromboembolism Development
Salmon, T.; Titley, M.; Noori, Z.; Crosby, M.; Sankaranarayanan, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundHigher rates of venous and arterial thromboembolism have been noted in coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). There has been limited research on the impact of anticoagulant and antiplatelet choice in COVID-19. MethodsThis was a single-centre retrospective cohort study of 933 patients with COVID-19 infection presenting between 01/02/2020 and 31/05/2020. Survival time at 90 days post-diagnosis and thromboembolism development were the measured outcomes. ResultsOf 933 total patients, mean age was 68 years and 54.4% were male. 297 (31.8%) did not survive at 90 days. A Cox proportional hazards model analysis found no statistically significant relationship between anticoagulant or antiplatelet choice and survival (p<0.05). 57 (6.3%) developed thromboembolism. Antiplatelet choice was not shown to have a statistically significant relationship with thromboembolism development. Warfarin and direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use did not have a statistically significant impact on thromboembolism development (p<0.05). Therapeutic low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) use was associated with increased thromboembolism risk (Odds ratio = 14.327, 95% CI 1.904 - 107.811, p = 0.010). ConclusionsAntiplatelet choice was shown to have no impact on survival or thromboembolism development in COVID-19. Anticoagulant choice did not impact survival or thromboembolism development, aside from LMWH. Therapeutic LMWH use was associated with increased risk of thromboembolism. However, it should be noted that the sample size for patients using therapeutic LMWH was small (n=4), and there may be confounding variables affecting both LMWH use and thromboembolism development. These findings should be repeated with a larger sample of patients using therapeutic LMWH with additional adjustment for cofounding variables.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Vascular Comorbidities Worsen Prognosis of Patients with Heart Failure Hospitalized with COVID-19 94%
- Anticoagulation trends in adults aged 65 and over with atrial fibrillation; a cohort study 93%
- Creatine Kinase during Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes is Associated with Major Bleeding 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The usefulness of D-dimer as a predictive marker for mortality in patients with COVID-19 hospitalized during the first wave in Italy 96%
- Pilot study to evaluate hypercoagulation and inflammation using rotational thromboelastometry and calprotectin in COVID-19 patients 95%
- Coagulation abnormalities in children with uncorrected congenital heart defects seen at a teaching hospital in a developing country 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Screening for Right Ventricular Dysfunction in the Emergency Department Using a Smartphone ECG Analysis Application: An External Validation Study with Acute Pulmonary Embolism Patients 93%
- Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation among Cancer Patients: Utilization Trends and In-Hospital Outcomes 93%
- Centhaquine Increases Stroke Volume and Cardiac Output in Patients with Hypovolemic Shock 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors of survival in patients with ischemic stroke and active cancer: A prospective, multicenter, observational study 94%
- Cardiomyopathy in patients with acute ischemic stroke and methamphetamine use: Relevance for cardioembolic stroke and outcome 93%
- A claims-based score for the prediction of bleeding in a contemporary cohort of patients receiving oral anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.