Back

Parallel genetic changes underlie integrated craniofacial traits in an adaptive radiation of trophic specialist pupfishes

St John, M. E.; Richards, E.; Dunker, J. C.; Romero, S.; Martin, C. H.

2021-07-01 evolutionary biology
10.1101/2021.07.01.450661 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Many factors such as divergence time, shared standing genetic variation, frequency of introgression, and mutation rates can influence the likelihood of whether populations adapt to similar environments via parallel or non-parallel genetic changes. However, the frequency of parallel vs non-parallel genetic changes resulting in parallel phenotypic evolution is still unknown. In this study, we used a QTL mapping approach to investigate the genetic basis of highly divergent craniofacial traits between scale- and snail-eating trophic specialist species across similar hypersaline lake environments in an adaptive radiation of pupfishes endemic to San Salvador Island, Bahamas. We raised F2 intercrosses of scale- and snail-eaters from two different lake populations of sympatric specialists, estimated linkage maps, scanned for significant QTL for 30 skeletal and craniofacial traits, and compared the location of QTL between lakes to quantify parallel and non-parallel genetic changes. We found strong support for parallel genetic changes in both lakes for five traits in which we detected a significant QTL in at least one lake. However, many of these shared QTL affected different, but highly correlated craniofacial traits in each lake, suggesting that pleiotropy and trait integration should not be neglected when estimating rates of parallel evolution. We further observed a 23-52% increase in adaptive introgression within shared QTL, suggesting that introgression may be important for parallel evolution. Overall, our results suggest that the same genomic regions contribute to parallel integrated craniofacial phenotypes across lakes. We also highlight the need for more expansive searches for shared QTL when testing for parallel evolution.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
22.3%
2
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.4%
3
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
Evolution & Development
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
5
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
7
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
8
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
9
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
10
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
11
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 36%
2.1%
13
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
14
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Journal of Fish Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
16
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
17
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Evolutionary Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
20
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
22
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%