Low mitochondrial copy number drives atherogenic cardiovascular disease: evidence from prospective cohort analyses in the UK Biobank combined with Mendelian Randomization
LUO, J.; Noordam, R.; Jukema, J. W.; Willems van Dijk, K.; Hägg, S.; Grassmann, F.; le Cessie, S.; van Heemst, D.
Show abstract
BackgroundMitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) content might be involved in the risk of cardiovascular disease. We aimed to investigate the association of mtDNA copy number (mtDNA-CN), as a proxy of mtDNA content, and coronary artery disease (CAD) and heart failure (HF) using multivariable adjusted and Mendelian Randomizations (MR) analyses. MethodsMultivariable-adjusted analyses were conducted using Cox-proportional hazard models in 273,619 unrelated European descendants from UK Biobank (UKB). MtDNA-CN in peripheral blood cells was computed based on the weighted intensities of the mitochondrial genome probes. For the two-sample MR analyses, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with mtDNA-CN were retrieved from genome-wide association studies in UKB. SNP-outcome associations were obtained for CAD from CARDIoGRAMplusC4D, UKB and FinnGen, comprising 902,538 participants (134,759 cases), and for HF from the HERMES consortium and FinnGen, collectively having data on 1,195,531 participants (70,706 cases). MR analyses were performed per database and results were subsequently meta analyzed using fixed-effects models per study. ResultsDuring a median follow-up of 11.8 years, participants in the lowest quintile of mtDNA-CN had higher risk for CAD (hazard ratio [95% CI]: 1.08 [1.03, 1.14]) and HF (hazard ratio [95% CI]: 1.15 [1.05, 1.24]) compared to those in the highest quintile. In MR analyses, the pooled odds ratios of genetically predicted per one-SD decrease in mtDNA were 1.16 (95% CI: 1.05, 1.27) for CAD and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.90, 1.10) for HF, respectively. ConclusionOur findings support a possible causal role of lower mtDNA-CN in higher CAD risk, but not in higher HF risk.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Polygenic Risk Score for Coronary Artery Disease Improves the Prediction of Early-Onset Myocardial Infarction and Mortality in Men 95%
- A polygenic risk score for coronary heart disease performs well in individuals aged 70 years and older 95%
- Dynamic Importance of Genomic and Clinical Risk for Coronary Artery Disease Over the Life Course 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome wide association analysis in dilated cardiomyopathy reveals two new key players in systolic heart failure on chromosome 3p25.1 and 22q11.23 94%
- Deciphering human heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) at single cell resolution 92%
- AORTA Gene: Polygenic prediction improves detection of thoracic aortic aneurysm 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A phenome-wide multi-directional Mendelian randomization analysis of atrial fibrillation 94%
- High-throughput multivariable Mendelian randomization analysis prioritizes apolipoprotein B as key lipid risk factor for coronary artery disease 94%
- Educational attainment as a modifier of the effect of polygenic scores for cardiovascular risk factors: cross-sectional and prospective analysis of UK Biobank 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic Architecture of Heart Failure with Preserved versus Reduced Ejection Fraction 96%
- Genome-wide association analysis and Mendelian randomization proteomics identify novel protein biomarkers and drug targets for primary prevention of heart failure 94%
- Transferability of genetic loci and polygenic scores for cardiometabolic traits in British Pakistanis and Bangladeshis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of imaging-free myocardial fibrosis prediction models, association with outcomes, and sample size estimation for phase 3 trials 94%
- Epigenomic prediction of cardiovascular disease risk and interactions with traditional risk metrics 93%
- Leveraging genetic data to elucidate the relationship between Covid-19 and ischemic stroke 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.