Penetrance estimation of SORL1 loss-of-function variants using a family-based strategy adjusted on APOE genotypes suggest a non-monogenic inheritance
Schramm, C.; Charbonnier, C.; Zarea, A.; Lacour, M.; Wallon, D.; CNRMAJ collaborators, ; Boland, A.; Deleuze, J.-F.; Olaso, R.; Alarcon, F.; Campion, D.; Nuel, G.; Nicolas, G.
Show abstract
For complex disorders, estimating the age-related penetrance associated with rare variants of strong effect is essential before a putative use for genetic counseling or disease prevention. However, rarity and co-occurrence with other risk factors make such estimations difficult. In the context of Alzheimer disease, we present a survival model to estimate the penetrance of SORL1 rare (allele frequency< 1%) Loss-of-Function variants (LoF) while accounting for APOE-{varepsilon}4, the main risk factor (allele frequency[~] 14% in Caucasians). We developed an efficient strategy to compute penetrance estimates accounting for both common and rare genetic variants based on available penetrance curves associated with common risk factors and using incomplete pedigree data to quantify the additional risk conferred by rare variants. Our model combines: (i) a baseline for non-carriers of SORL1 LoF variants, stratified by APOE genotypes derived from the Rotterdam study and (ii) an age-dependent proportional hazard effect for SORL1 LoF variants estimated from pedigrees with a proband carrying such a variant. We embed this model into an Expectation-Maximisation algorithm to accommodate for missing genotypes. Confidence intervals were computed by bootstraps. To correct for ascertainment bias, proband phenotypes were omitted. We obtained penetrance curves associated with SORL1 LoF variants at the digenic level. By age 70, we estimate a 100% penetrance of SORL1 LoF variants only among APOE-{varepsilon}4{varepsilon}4 carriers, while penetrance is 56%[40% - 72%] among {varepsilon}4 heterozygous carriers and 37%[26% - 51%] among {varepsilon}4 non-carriers. We conclude that rare SORL1 LoF variants should not be used for genetic counseling regardless of the APOE status.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploiting Family History in Aggregation Unit-based Genetic Association Tests 96%
- An expanded analysis framework for multivariate GWAS connects inflammatory biomarkers to functional variants and disease 92%
- Prioritization of disease genes from GWAS using ensemble based positive-unlabeled learning 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The genetic overlap between Alzheimer’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Lewy body dementia, and Parkinson’s disease 94%
- Explainable artificial intelligence identifies an AQP4 polymorphism-based risk score associated with brain amyloid burden 93%
- Dissecting the role of Amerindian genetic ancestry and ApoE ε4 allele on Alzheimer disease in an admixed Peruvian population 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Bayesian transcriptome-wide association study method leveraging both cis- and trans- eQTL information through summary statistics 95%
- Non-Coding and Loss-of-Function Coding Variants in TET2 are Associated with Multiple Neurodegenerative Diseases 95%
- Genetic association studies using disease liabilities from deep neural networks 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tau-first subtype of Alzheimer's disease consistently identified across in vivo and post mortem studies 93%
- Selective vulnerability and resilience to Alzheimer's disease tauopathy as a function of genes and the connectome 93%
- Genetic risk factor clustering within and across neurodegenerative diseases 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.