Back

Horizontal Transfer of Histone H3 by Mammalian Cells

Sulkowski, P. L.; Nicholson, H. E.; Li, M. Z.; Perrimon, N.; Liu, Z.; Kaelin, W. G.

2021-06-30 cell biology
10.1101/2021.06.30.450524 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The authors have withdrawn their manuscript because many of the experiments described in this paper have not been reproducible, or at least are not robust, in the hands of other members of the Kaelin Laboratory who were not initially involved in this work. While we do see apparent secretion of histone H3 under some conditions, it is usually accompanied by secretion of histone H4. In this regard, the Halo tagged-histone H3 and Halo-tagged H4 constructs used for the single molecule imaging studies we reported, which seemingly confirmed specific secretion and transfer of histone H3, were purported to be sequence validated. Upon resequencing these constructs we discovered a non-synonymous mutation in the Halo tag of the H4 construct. We then redid the imaging experiments with the corrected Halo-H4 together with Halo-H3 and, in contrast to our earlier study, unfused Halo. These experiments were difficult to interpret because of the background signal seen with the unfused Halo but did not support specific secretion and transfer of histones (let alone specific secretion and transfer of histone H3). We have, in some experiments, observed transfer of H3-Cre into reporter cells ex vivo and in vivo, but 1) the transfer is not specific for H3-Cre versus H4-Cre, 2) the transfer efficiency is highly variable, and 3) the transfer efficiency is typically much less than reported in our original paper. We do not yet know whether this lack of reproducibility and robustness reflects technical and biological variables that we do not yet understand and hence were not captured in our experimental protocols. Therefore, the authors do not wish this work to be cited as reference for the project. If you have any questions, please contact the corresponding author.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
3
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.3%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
6
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.3%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.2%
8
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
9
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
10
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
11
Open Biology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
12
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
13
STAR Protocols
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
15
The EMBO Journal
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
19
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
20
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
21
BMC Molecular and Cell Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
22
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
ACS Chemical Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%