Back

Promoting long-term forest landscape resilience in the Lake Tahoe basin

Abelson, E. S.; Reynolds, K. M.; White, A. M.; Long, J. W.; Maxwell, C.; Manley, P. N.

2021-07-01 ecology
10.1101/2021.06.29.450434 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Rapid environmental changes expected in the 21st century challenge the resilience of wildlands around the world. The western portion of the Lake Tahoe basin (LTW) in California is an important ecological and cultural hotspot that is at risk of degradation from current and future environmental pressures. Historical uses, fire suppression, and a changing climate have created forest landscape conditions at risk of drought stress, destructive fire, and loss of habitat diversity. We prospectively modeled forest landscape conditions for a period of 100 years to evaluate the efficacy of five unique management scenarios in achieving desired landscape conditions across the 23,600 hectares of LTW. Management scenarios ranged from no management other than fire suppression to applying treatments consistent with historical fire frequencies and extent (i.e., regular and broadscale biomass reduction). We developed a decision support tool to evaluate environmental and social outcomes within a single framework to provide a transparent set of costs and benefits; results illuminated underlying mechanisms of forest resilience and provided actionable guidance to decision makers. Sixteen attributes were assessed in the model after assigning weights to each, derived through a survey of stakeholder priorities, so that the contribution of each attribute to evaluations of scenario performance was influenced by the combined priorities of stakeholders. We found that removing forest biomass across the landscape, particularly when accomplished using extensive fire-based removal techniques, led to highly favorable conditions for environmental quality and promoting overall landscape resilience. Environmental conditions resulting from extensive fire-based biomass removal also had nominal variation over time, in contrast with strategies that had less extensive and/or used physical removal techniques, namely thinning. Our analysis provided a transparent approach to data assessment, considering the priorities of stakeholders, to provide insights into the complexities of maintaining optimal conditions and managing landscapes to promote ecosystem resilience in a changing world.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 20%
8.6%
3
Journal of Environmental Management
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.7%
4
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.3%
5
Environmental Research Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
6
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.7%
7
Forest Ecology and Management
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
8
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
9
Ecological Indicators
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
10
Conservation Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
11
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
12
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
13
Conservation Science and Practice
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
14
FACETS
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
15
Landscape Ecology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
16
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
17
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
18
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
19
Conservation Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
20
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
21
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
22
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
23
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
24
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
25
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.1%
26
Ecological Modelling
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
27
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Sustainability
10 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%