Back

Insulin-dependent and -independent dynamics of insulin receptor trafficking in muscle cells

Cen, H. H.; Rogalski, J.; Abraham, L.; Gold, M. R.; Foster, L.; Johnson, J. D.

2021-06-29 cell biology
10.1101/2021.06.29.450241 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Insulin resistance contributes to type 2 diabetes and can be driven by hyperinsulinemia. Insulin receptor (INSR) internalization and cell-surface dynamics at rest and during insulin exposure are incompletely understood in muscle cells. Using surface labelling and live-cell imaging, we observed robust basal internalization of INSR in C2C12 myoblasts, without an effect of added insulin. Mass-spectrometry using INSR knockout cells as controls, identified high-confidence binding partners, including proteins associated with internalization. We confirmed known interactors, including IGF1R, but also identified underappreciated INSR-binding factors such as ANXA2. AlphaFold-Multimer analysis of these INSR-binding proteins predicted potential INSR binding sites of these proteins. Protein-protein interaction network mapping suggested links between INSR and caveolin-mediated endocytosis. INSR interacted with both caveolin and clathrin heavy chain (CLTC) in mouse skeletal muscle and C2C12 myoblasts. Whole cell 2D super-resolution imaging revealed that high levels of insulin (20 nM) increased INSR colocalization with CAV1 but decreased its colocalization with CLTC. Single particle tracking confirmed the colocalization of cell-surface INSR with both over-expressed CAV1-mRFP and CLTC-mRFP. INSR tracks that colocalized with CAV1 exhibited longer radii and lifetimes, regardless of insulin exposure, compared to non-colocalized tracks, whereas insulin further increased the lifetime of INSR/CLTC colocalized tracks. Overall, these data suggest that muscle cells utilize both CAV1 and CLTC-dependent pathways for INSR dynamics and internalization.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.