Back

Pancreatic cancer risk predicted from disease trajectories using deep learning

Placido, D.; Yuan, B.; Hu, J. X.; Haue, A. D.; Yuan, C.; Kim, J.; Umeton, R.; Antell, G.; Chowdhury, A.; Franz, A.; Brais, L.; Andrews, E.; Regev, A.; Kraft, P.; Wolpin, B. M.; Rosenthal, M.; Brunak, S.; Sander, C.

2021-06-28 bioinformatics
10.1101/2021.06.27.449937 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive disease that typically presents late with poor patient outcomes. There is a pronounced medical need for early detection of pancreatic cancer, which can be addressed by identifying high-risk populations. Here we apply artificial intelligence (AI) methods to a dataset of 6 million patient records with 24,000 pancreatic cancer cases in the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR) and, for comparison, a dataset of three million records with 3,900 pancreatic cancer cases in the United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US-VA) healthcare system. In contrast to existing methods that do not use temporal information, we explicitly train machine learning models on the time sequence of diseases in patient clinical histories and test the ability to predict cancer occurrence in time intervals of 3 to 60 months after risk assessment. For cancer occurrence within 36 months, the performance of the best model (AUROC=0.88, DNPR), trained and tested on disease trajectories, exceeds that of a model without longitudinal information (AUROC=0.85, DNPR). Performance decreases when disease events within a 3 month window before cancer diagnosis are excluded from training (AUROC[3m]=0.83). Independent training and testing on the US-VA dataset reaches comparable performance (AUROC=0.78, AUROC[3m]=0.76). These results raise the state-of-the-art level of performance of cancer risk prediction on real-world data sets and provide support for the design of prediction-surveillance programs based on risk assessment in a large population followed by affordable surveillance of a relatively small number of patients at highest risk. Use of AI on real-world clinical records has the potential to shift focus from treatment of late-stage to early-stage cancer, benefiting patients by improving lifespan and quality of life.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.