A lineage tree-based hidden Markov model to quantify cellular heterogeneity and plasticity
Mohammadi, F.; Visagan, S.; Gross, S. M.; Karginov, L.; Lagarde, J.; Heiser, L. M.; Meyer, A. S.
Show abstract
Cell plasticity operates alongside other sources of cell-to-cell heterogeneity, such as genetic mutations and variation in signaling, together preventing most cancer therapies from being curative. The predominant methods of quantifying tumor-drug response operate on snapshot, population-level measurements and therefore lack evolutionary dynamics, which are particularly critical for dynamic processes such as plasticity. Here we apply a lineage tree-based adaptation of a hidden Markov model that employs single cell lineages as input to learn the characteristic patterns of single cell phenotypic heterogeneity and state transitions in an unsupervised fashion. To benchmark our model, we paired cell fate with either cell lifetimes or individual cell cycle phase lengths on synthetic data and demonstrated that the model successfully classifies cells within experimentally tractable dataset sizes. As an application, we analyzed experimental measurements of same measurements in cancer and non-cancer cell populations under various treatments. We find that in each case multiple phenotypically distinct states exist, with significant heterogeneity and unique drug responses. In total, this framework allows for the flexible classification of single cell heterogeneity across lineages.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Emergent signal execution modes in biochemical reaction networks calibrated to experimental data 96%
- Population Dynamics of EMT Elucidates the Timing and Distribution of Phenotypic Intra-tumoral Heterogeneity 95%
- Random Parametric Perturbations of Gene Regulatory Circuit Uncover State Transitions in Cell Cycle 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.