A random priming amplification method for whole genome sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 and H1N1 influenza A virus.
Chrzastek, K.; Tennakoon, C.; Bialy, D.; Freimanis, G. L.; Flannery, J.; Shelton, H.
Show abstract
BackgroundNon-targeted whole genome sequencing is a powerful tool to comprehensively identify constituents of microbial communities in a sample. There is no need to direct the analysis to any identification before sequencing which can decrease the introduction of bias and false negatives results. It also allows the assessment of genetic aberrations in the genome (e.g., single nucleotide variants, deletions, insertions and copy number variants) including in noncoding protein regions. MethodsThe performance of four different random priming amplification methods to recover RNA viral genetic material of SARS-CoV-2 were compared in this study. In method 1 (H-P) the reverse transcriptase (RT) step was performed with random hexamers whereas in methods 2-4 RT incorporating an octamer primer with a known tag. In methods 1 and 2 (K-P) sequencing was applied on material derived from the RT-PCR step, whereas in methods 3 (SISPA) and 4 (S-P) an additional amplification was incorporated before sequencing. ResultsThe SISPA method was the most effective and efficient method for non-targeted/random priming whole genome sequencing of COVID that we tested. The SISPA method described in this study allowed for whole genome assembly of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 in mixed samples. We determined the limit of detection and characterization of SARS-CoV-2 virus which was 103 pfu/ml (Ct, 22.4) for whole genome assembly and 101 pfu/ml (Ct, 30) for metagenomics detection. ConclusionsThe SISPA method is predominantly useful for obtaining genome sequences from RNA viruses or investigating complex clinical samples as no prior sequence information is needed. It might be applied to monitor genomic virus changes, virus evolution and can be used for fast metagenomics detection or to assess the general picture of different pathogens within the sample.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Oligonucleotide Capture Sequencing of the SARS-CoV-2 Genome and Subgenomic Fragments from COVID-19 Individuals 97%
- Nanopore Sequencing of SARS-CoV-2: Comparison of Short and Long PCR-tiling Amplicon Protocols 97%
- A Short Plus Long-Amplicon Based Sequencing Approach Improves Genomic Coverage and Variant Detection In the SARS-CoV-2 Genome 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genomic Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 Using Long-Range PCR Primers 95%
- A SARS-CoV-2 negative antigen rapid diagnostic in RT-qPCR positive samples correlates with a low likelihood of infectious viruses in the nasopharynx 94%
- In depth characterization of an archaeal virus-host system reveals numerous virus exclusion mechanisms 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A multiplexed RT-PCR Assay for Nanopore Whole Genome Sequencing of Tilapia lake virus (TiLV) 96%
- A Paper-based Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) Assay for Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza 95%
- Development and validation of cost-effective one-step multiplex RT-PCR assay for detecting the SARS-CoV-2 infection using SYBR Green melting curve analysis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of SARS-CoV2 N gene real-time RT-PCR targets and commercially available mastermixes 95%
- A newly developed whole genome sequencing protocol enables early tracking of Enterovirus D68 molecular evolution. 95%
- Comparison of Illumina MiSeq and the Ion Torrent PGM and S5 platforms for whole-genome sequencing of picornaviruses and caliciviruses 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.