Automated, miniaturized, and scalable screening of healthcare workers, first responders, and students for SARS-CoV-2 in San Diego County
Morgan, S. C.; Aigner, S.; Anderson, C.; Belda-Ferre, P.; De Hoff, P.; Marotz, C. A.; Sathe, S.; Zeller, M.; Ahmed, N.; Audhya, X.; Baer, N. A.; Barber, T.; Barrick, B.; Batachari, L.; Betty, M.; Blue, S. M.; Brainard, B.; Buckley, T.; Case, J.; Castro-Martinez, A.; Chacon, M.; Cheung, W.; Chong, L.; Coufal, N. G.; Crescini, E. S.; DeGrand, S.; Dimmock, D. P.; Donofrio-Odmann, J. J.; Eisner, E. R.; Estaki, M.; Franco Vargas, L.; Freddock, M.; Gallant, R. M.; Galmozzi, A.; Gao, N. J.; Gilmer, S.; Grzelak, E. M.; Hakim, A.; Hart, J.; Hobbs, C.; Humphrey, G.; Ilkenhans, N.; Jacobs, M.; Kahn, C. A
Show abstract
BackgroundSuccessful containment strategies for SARS-CoV-2, the causative virus of the COVID-19 pandemic, have involved widespread population testing that identifies infections early and enables rapid contact tracing. In this study, we developed a rapid and inexpensive RT- qPCR testing pipeline for population-level SARS-CoV-2 detection, and used this pipeline to establish a clinical laboratory dedicated to COVID-19 testing at the University of California San Diego (UCSD) with a processing capacity of 6,000 samples per day and next-day result turnaround times. Methods and findingsUsing this pipeline, we screened 6,786 healthcare workers and first responders, and 21,220 students, faculty, and staff from UCSD. Additionally, we screened 6,031 preschool-grade 12 students and staff from public and private schools across San Diego County that remained fully or partially open for in-person teaching during the pandemic. Between April 17, 2020 and February 5, 2021, participants provided 161,582 nasal swabs that were tested for the presence of SARS-CoV-2. Overall, 752 positive tests were obtained, yielding a test positivity rate of 0.47%. While the presence of symptoms was significantly correlated with higher viral load, most of the COVID-19 positive participants who participated in symptom surveys were asymptomatic at the time of testing. The positivity rate among preschool-grade 12 schools that remained open for in-person teaching was similar to the positivity rate at UCSD and lower than that of San Diego County, with the children in private schools being less likely to test positive than the adults at these schools. ConclusionsMost schools across the United States have been closed for in-person learning for much of the 2020-2021 school year, and their safe reopening is a national priority. However, as there are no vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 currently available to the majority of school-aged children, the traditional strategies of mandatory masking, physical distancing, and repeated viral testing of students and staff remain key components of risk mitigation in these settings. The data presented here suggest that the safety measures and repeated testing actions taken by participating healthcare and educational facilities were effective in preventing outbreaks, and that a similar combination of risk-mitigation strategies and repeated testing may be successfully adopted by other healthcare and educational systems.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical evaluation of the Diagnostic Analyzer for Selective Hybridization (DASH): a point-of-care PCR test for rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection 97%
- Diagnostic Value of Symptoms for Pediatric SARS-CoV-2 Infection in a Primary Care Setting 95%
- Incidence of COVID-19 reinfection among Midwestern healthcare employees 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnostic testing preferences can help inform future public health response efforts: global insights from an international survey 94%
- Self-tests for COVID-19: what is the evidence? A living systematic review and meta-analysis (2020-2023) 94%
- Within-country heterogeneity in patterns of social contact relevant for tuberculosis infection transmission, prevention, and care 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating Specimen Quality and Results from a Community-Wide, Home-Based Respiratory Surveillance Study 96%
- A multicenter study to assess the performance of the point-of-care RT-PCR Cobas SARS-CoV-2 & Influenza A/B nucleic acid test for use on the Cobas Liat system in comparison with centralized assays across healthcare facilities in the United States 95%
- Performance and Implementation Evaluation of the Abbott BinaxNOW Rapid Antigen Test in a High-throughput Drive-through Community Testing Site in Massachusetts 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Strategies to Estimate Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in a Texas Vulnerable Population: Results from Phase I of the Texas Coronavirus Antibody REsponse Survey (TX CARES) 95%
- Providing a safe, in-person, residential college experience during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- Aerosol Formation During Processing of Potentially Infectious Samples on Roche Immunochemistry Analyzers (cobas e analyzers) and in an End-to-End Laboratory Workflow to Model SARS-CoV-2 Infection Risk for Laboratory Operators 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of the INDICAID™ COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test in symptomatic populations and asymptomatic community testing 96%
- Performance of the Cue COVID-19 Molecular Test for Point of Care: Insights from a multi-site clinic service model 95%
- Investigating sensitivity of nasal or throat (ISNOT): A combination of both swabs increases sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.