Back

Two evolutionary distinct effectors from a nematode and virus target RanGAP1 and 2 via the WPP domain to promote disease

Sukarta, O. C. A.; Munoz, A. D. G.; Slootweg, E. J.; Overmars, H.; van Schaik, C.; Pokhare, S.; Roosien, J.; Pomp, R.; Elashry, A.; Grundler, F.; Smant, G.; Goverse, A.

2021-06-25 plant biology
10.1101/2021.06.24.449730 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The Gpa2 and Rx1 intracellular immune receptors are canonical CC-NB-LRR proteins belonging to the same R gene cluster in potato. Despite sharing high sequence homology, they have evolved to provide defence against unrelated pathogens. Gpa2 detects Gp-RBP-1 effectors secreted by the potato cyst nematode Globodera pallida whereas Rx1 recognizes the viral coat protein (CP) of Potato Virus X (PVX). How Gpa2 and Rx1 perceive their matching effectors remains unknown. Using a combination of in planta Co-Immunoprecipitation and cellular imaging, we show that both Gp-RBP-1 and PVX-CP physically interact with RanGAP2 and RanGAP1 in the cytoplasm of plant cells. Interestingly, this was also demonstrated for the eliciting variants of Gp-RBP-1 and PVX-CP indicating a role for RanGAP1 and RanGAP2 in pathogenicity independent from Gpa2 and Rx1 recognition. Indeed, knocking down both RanGAP homologs reduce cyst nematode and PVX infection. These findings show that RanGAP1/2 act as common host targets of evolutionary distinct effectors from two plant pathogens with different lifestyles. The involvement of RanGAP1/2 to pathogen virulence is a novel role not yet reported for these key host cell components and as such, their possible role in cyst nematode parasitism and viral pathogenicity are discussed. Moreover, from these findings a model emerges for their possible role as co-factor in pathogen recognition by the potato immune receptors Gpa2/Rx1.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.