Extensive validation and prospective observation of the impact of an AI-based rapid antibiotics susceptibility prediction platform in multiple medical centers
Wang, H.-Y.; Chung, C.-R.; Tseng, Y.-J.; Yu, J.-R.; Chen, C.-J.; Wu, M.-H.; Lin, T.-W.; Huang, W.-T.; Liu, T.-P.; Lee, T.-Y.; Horng, J.-T.; Lu, J.-J.
Show abstract
ImportanceNo medical artificial intelligence (AI) has been robustly validated and deployed in a clinical laboratory in real-world settings, and the clinical impact of the medical AI remains unknown. ObjectiveTo deploy a medical AI platform for rapid antibiotics susceptibility test (AST) prediction, and evaluate its clinical impacts. DesignA medical AI platform, XBugHunter, was extensively validated (internal validation, time-wise validation, and independent testing) with data between May 22, 2013 and June 30, 2019. The clinical impact was evaluated based on a prospective observation from February 1 to September 30, 2020 during deployment. SettingData was collected in two tertiary medical centers in Taiwan, and the AI was deployed in a tertiary medical center. ParticipantsFor validation, 90,064 consecutive cases were included. During the deployment, a prospective observational cohort of 1,490 consecutive cases was collected. ExposuresAST prediction from XBugHunter Main outcomes and MeasuresDiagnostic performance of XBugHunter was evaluated during validation. The clinical impact was evaluated in terms of the saving of inappropriate antibiotics prescription, AST turn-around-time, and mortality of bacteremia during deployment. ResultsPredictive models consistently performed well in the extensive validations. In the deployment, XBugHunters predictive sensitivity and specificity for Staphylococcus aureus (oxacillin) were 0.95 (95% CI, 0.82-0.98) and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94-0.99), respectively. For Acinetobacter baumannii (multiple drugs), the sensitivity was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.91-0.99) and specificity was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.88-0.98). The turn-around-time reduction on reporting AST of blood cultures was 35.72 h (standard deviation: 15.55 h). Death within 28 days occurred in 28 of 162 S. aureus bacteremia patients (17.28%) in the XBugHunter intervention group, which was lower than the 28 days mortality rate (28.06% [55/196]) in the same period of time in 2019, without XBugHunter. The relative risk reduction was 38.4% (relative risk, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.41-0.92). Regarding antibiotic prescriptions, 2723.7 defined daily dose per year of inappropriate antibiotics could be avoided for treating S. aureus by deploying XBugHunter. Conclusions and RelevanceAmong S. aureus bacteremia patients, this study demonstrated that XBugHunter can prevent inappropriate antibiotic use, and the adjustment of antibiotic treatment can yield lower mortality. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSWhat is the clinical impact of XBugHunter, a machine learning-based, antibiotic susceptibility test prediction platform? FindingsIn the prospective observational cohort of deploying XBugHunter, the reduction of turn-around-time of reporting antibiotic susceptibility test was 35.72h. The reduction of S. aureus bacteremia mortality rate was 10.78%, and the estimated saving of inappropriate antibiotics uses was 2723.7 defined daily dose per year. MeaningDeployment of XBugHunter provides a more rapid report of antibiotic susceptibility test, and thus reduces inappropriate antibiotics prescription and mortality of S. aureus bacteremia.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- GPT-4 based AI agents - the new expert system for detection of antimicrobial resistance mechanisms? 93%
- A multicenter evaluation of a novel microfluidic rapid AST assay for Gram-negative bloodstream infections 92%
- Metagenomic sequencing as a clinical diagnostic tool for infectious diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- ΔCt-Informed, Calibrated Logistic Regression Accurately Attributes mecA in Staphylococcus aureus-Positive Wound Specimens. 93%
- Rapid nanopore metagenomic sequencing and predictive susceptibility testing of positive blood cultures from intensive care patients with sepsis 93%
- A novel strategy for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 variants based on multiplex PCR-MALDI-TOF MS 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Influence of Sequencing Technology on Pangenome-level Analysis and Detection of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in ESKAPE Pathogens 92%
- A Predictive Model to Identify Complicated Clostridiodes difficile Infection 91%
- Diagnostic utility of a Ferritin-to-Procalcitonin Ratio to differentiate patients with COVID-19 from those with Bacterial Pneumonia: A multicenter study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of de-duplication methods used by WHO Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (GLASS) and Japan Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (JANIS) in the surveillance of antimicrobial resistance 94%
- Development of a Risk Prediction Model for Sepsis-Related Delirium Based on Multiple Machine Learning Approaches and an Online Calculator 93%
- A comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting bloodstream infection outcome using machine learning 93%
- PathCrisp : An Innovative Molecular Diagnostic Tool for Early Detection of NDM-Resistant Infections 92%
- Evaluation of Domain Generalization and Adaptation on Improving Model Robustness to Temporal Dataset Shift in Clinical Medicine 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.