Trash-basket epiphytes as secondary foundation species: a review of their distribution and effects on biodiversity and ecosystem functions
Ortega-Solis, G.; Diaz, I.; Mellado-Mansilla, D.; Tejo, C.; Tello, F.; Craven, D.; Kreft, H.; Armesto, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundSecondary foundation species (FS) are organisms that inhabit ecosystems structurally defined by a primary foundation species, providing additional structure to habitats and communities. Trash-basket epiphytes (TBE) are secondary FS that enhance arboreal soil accumulation, providing shelter to animals, and rooting sites for plants. While their importance may vary across biomes, TBE have been overlooked as drivers of biodiversity and ecosystem functions. Here, we discuss the prevalence of TBE across biomes, their effects on biodiversity and ecosystem functions, and future research directions. MethodsWe performed a systematic literature review of articles, books and theses and collated and synthesised information about the taxonomic distribution of TBE, their effects on ecosystem functions, and reports of plant-animal and plant-plant interactions. Then, we analysed the global distribution of TBE using a generalized linear model and summarised two studies to assess their effects on soil invertebrates. ResultsWe identified 120 publications describing 209 species of TBE. Most TBE belong to Araceae (43%), Polypodiaceae (23%), and Orchidaceae (14%) and occur in all tropical and southern temperate forests. TBE richness peaks in the South-American Pacific mangroves, Eastern Cordillera Real, and the Napo moist forests. TBE effects on ecosystem functions include arboreal soil accumulation, water retention and temperature regulation in the canopy, and nutrient leaching through stem-flow. TBE provide shelter to species in more than 97 animal families, including from invertebrates to mammals, while 72 vascular plants have been reported to root in arboreal soil of TBE. ConclusionsTBE are a compelling group of model organisms that can be used to study ecological processes such as facilitation cascades, niche construction, extended phenotypes, or the effects of secondary FS on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. TBE should also be included in forest management plans to enhance the availability of microhabitats in the canopy supporting its associated flora and fauna.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Bark beetles as ecosystem engineers: triggered tree mortality rearranges the assemblage of Tree-related Microhabitats in old-growth coniferous forest 97%
- Eucalyptus cover as the primary driver of native forest bird reductions: evidence from a stand-scale analysis in NW Iberia 96%
- Edge effects constraint endemic but not introduced arthropod species in a pristine forest on Terceira (Azores, Portugal) 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Vegetation structural complexity uniquely captures competition between vascular plants and bryophytes over succession 96%
- Forest structure and degradation drive canopy gap sizes across the Brazilian Amazon 95%
- Pathways of savannization in a mesic African savanna-forest mosaic following an extreme fire 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Change in liana density over 30 years in a Bornean rain forest supports the escape hypothesis 96%
- The shrub Ephedra californica facilitates arthropod communities along a regional desert climatic gradient. 95%
- Pawpaws prevent predictability: A locally-dominant tree alters understory beta-diversity and community assembly 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.