Back

Proteome-wide probing of the dual NMT-dependent myristoylation tradeoff unveils potent, mechanism-based suicide inhibitors

Riviere, F.; Dian, C.; Dutheil, R. F.; Giglione, C.; Meinnel, T.

2021-06-22 biochemistry
10.1101/2021.06.22.449375 bioRxiv
Show abstract

N-myristoyltransferases (NMTs) catalyze protein myristoylation, a major and ubiquitous lipid modification. Originally thought to modify only N-terminal glycine -amino groups (G-myristoylation), NMTs are now known to modify lysine {varepsilon}-amino groups (K-myristoylation), the significance of which is uncertain. Here we exploited systematic structural proteomics analyses and a novel pipeline involving the Shigella IpaJ protease to discriminate K- and G-myristoylation with unprecedented accuracy and identify the specific features driving each modification. NMT-dependent K-myristoylation occurs post-translationally and only on lysines 1, 2, or 3 following G-myristoylation or caspase cleavage. Direct interactions between the substrates reactive amino group and the NMT catalytic base slow K-myristoylation catalysis. IpaJ unmasked novel K-myristoylation sites in a dozen human proteins. The unique properties of NMT-driven K-myristoylation allowed us to design potent, mechanism-based suicide NMT inhibitors. These analyses unravel the respective paths towards K-myristoylation, G-myristoylation, or NMT inhibition, which rely on a very subtle tradeoff embracing the chemical landscape around the reactive group. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTWe report the specific and unique elements guiding N-myristoyltransferase to either alpha or epsilon myristoylation, allowing us to establish the post-translational nature of N-myristoyltransferase-dependent lysine myristoylation and design novel, potent N-myristoyltransferase inhibitors.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.