RGC-TBRS Personal Air Pollutant Exposure versus Health Condition and Perception Pilot Study for Young Asthmatics in Hong Kong (2019/2020)
Chow, K.; Han, Y.; Li, V. O.; Lam, J. C.; Lee, S.-l.; Wong, W.; Lau, Y.-l.
Show abstract
This is a report of the RGC-TBRS funded observational pilot study which examines the effects of personal exposures to three types of air pollutants, namely, PM1.0, PM2.5, and PM10, on personal health condition and perception of young asthmatics (aged 12 - 15) in Hong Kong. This is the first study to investigate the relationship between PM1.0 and FEV1 and FVC of young asthmatics in Hong Kong, based on personal exposures obtained from portable sensors. Our preliminary results show that a higher level of PM1.0, PM2.5 and PM10 would deteriorate the health conditions of young asthmatics in HK. All correlations between particulates and lung functions are significant and negative, including PM1.0 exposure vs. FEV1 (R2=12%; p=0.023), PM1.0 exposure vs. FVC (R2=15%; p=0.010), PM2.5 exposure vs. FEV1 (R2=13%; p=0.019), PM2.5 exposure vs. FVC (R2=16%; p=0.008), PM10 exposure vs. FEV1 (R2=14%; p=0.012), and PM10 exposure vs. FVC (R2=18%; p=0.005). Moreover, after accounting for covariates, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), temperature, and relative humidity, we found a significant relationship between PM1.0 exposure vs. FVC (Coefficient=-0.1224; p=0.032), PM2.5 exposure vs. FVC (Coefficient=-0.1177; p=0.021), PM10 exposure vs. FEV1 (Coefficient=-0.0703; p=0.019), and PM10 exposure vs. FVC (Coefficient=-0.1204; p=0.006). Further, using the pilot study data, we have performed a power analysis to estimate the sample size for our follow-up main study. Based on the primary null hypothesis that personal PM exposure would not change the FEV1 and FVC of young asthmatics in HK, the lowest sample size that gives 80% power at a 5% significance level is 107. Hence, the sample size (or the total number of participated asthma subjects) expected for the follow-up longitudinal clinical study should be 125 (after adjusting for the non-compliance and withdrawal of subjects). Our pilot study has demonstrated the feasibility of research into the effects of personal air pollutant exposure on health condition and health perception. Our follow-up study will address the challenges identified in the pilot study, based on the proposed follow-up actions for subject engagement, data collection, and data analysis.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Experimental efficacy of the face shield and the mask against emitted and potentially received particles 96%
- The impact of large mobile air purifiers on aerosol concentration in classrooms and the reduction of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 95%
- SARS-CoV-2 Aerosol Transmission Indoors: A Closer Look at Viral Load, Infectivity, the Effectiveness of Preventive Measures and a Simple Approach for Practical Recommendations 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors associated with secondhand smoke exposure among non-smoking employees in the workplace: A cross-sectional study in Qingdao, China 95%
- Potential Health Benefits of Eliminating Traffic Emissions in Urban Areas 95%
- Study on Spatial-temporal Variation of Atmospheric Pollution in China between 2014 and 2019 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessment of Environmental and Occupational Risk Factors for the Mitigation and Containment of a COVID-19 Outbreak in a Meat Processing Plant 92%
- Spread of infection and treatment interruption among Japanese workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study 90%
- Early surveillance and public health emergency disposal measures between novel coronavirus disease 2019 and avian influenza in China: a case-comparison study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Minimizing exposure to respiratory droplets, ‘jet riders’ and aerosols in air-conditioned hospital rooms by a ‘Shield-and-Sink’ strategy 91%
- The Potential role of Particulate Matter in the Spreading of COVID-19 in Northern Italy: First Evidence-based Research Hypotheses 91%
- Ventilation and detection of airborne SARS-CoV-2: elucidating high-risk spaces in naturally ventilated healthcare settings 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.