Back

The functional properties of synapses made by regenerated axons across spinal cord lesion sites

Parker, D.

2021-06-22 neuroscience
10.1101/2021.06.21.449247 bioRxiv
Show abstract

While the anatomical properties of regenerated axons across spinal cord lesion sites have been studied extensively, little is known of how the functional properties of regenerated synapses compare to those in unlesioned animals. This comparison has been performed here in the lamprey, a model system for spinal injury research, in which functional locomotor recovery after spinal cord lesions is associated with axonal regeneration across the lesion site. Regenerated synapses below the lesion site did not differ to synapses from unlesioned axons with respect to the amplitude and duration of single excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs). They also showed the same activity-dependent depression over spike trains. However, regenerated synapses did differ to unlesioned synapses as the estimated number of synaptic vesicles was greater and there was evidence for an increased postsynaptic quantal amplitude. For axons above the lesion site, the amplitude and duration of single synaptic inputs also did not differ significantly to unlesioned animals. However, in this case there was evidence of a reduction in release probability and inputs facilitated rather that depressed over spike trains. Synaptic inputs from single regenerated axons below the lesion site thus do not increase in amplitude to compensate for the reduced number of descending axons after functional recovery. However, the postsynaptic input is maintained at the unlesioned level using different synaptic properties. Conversely, the facilitation from the same initial amplitude above the lesion site will make the synaptic input over spike trains functionally stronger. This may help to increase propriospinal activity across the lesion site to compensate for the lesion-induced reduction in supraspinal inputs.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.