Back

Dominant Effect Of Host Genetics On Skin Microbiota Composition In Homeostasis And Wound Healing

Galbraith, J.; Legrand, J.; Muller, N.; Baz, B.; Togher, K.; Matigian, N.; Kang, S.; Young, S.; Mortlock, S.; Roy, E.; Morahan, G.; Walker, G.; Morrison, M.; Khosrotehrani, K.

2021-06-21 systems biology
10.1101/2021.06.20.449197 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Animal microbiota have complex interactions with hosts and environment that determines its composition. Yet the ability of hosts to determine their microbiota composition is less well studied. In this study, to investigate the role host genetics in determining skin microbiota, we used 30 different mouse strains from the recombinant inbred panel, the Collaborative Cross. Murine skin microbiota composition was strongly dependent on murine strain with > 50% of the variation explained by murine strain. In particular, a quantitative trait locus on chromosome 4 associates both with Staphylococcus abundance and principal-component multi-trait analyses. Additionally, excisional wound associated changes in microbiota composition were not uniform across mouse strains and were host-specific, the genetic background accounting for about 40% of the variation in microbiota. Genetic background also had the highest effect on the healing speed of wounds accounting for over 50% of the variation while mouse age and microbiota composition change accounted only for 20% and 5% of the healing speed despite reaching statistical significance. In conclusion, host genetics has a significant impact on the skin microbiota composition during both homeostasis and wound healing. These findings have long reaching implications in our understanding of associations between microbiota dysbiosis and disease.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Microbiome
154 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
11.9%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 6%
8.9%
3
Matrix Biology Plus
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
4
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
5
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.5%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.2%
7
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.5%
8
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.8%
10
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 17%
2.1%
11
BMC Medical Genomics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
12
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.9%
13
Human Genomics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
14
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
16
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
17
Experimental Dermatology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
18
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
58 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
19
The Journal of Pathology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
20
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
22
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
23
Matrix Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
24
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Gut Microbes
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
28
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.6%
29
Cell Host & Microbe
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%