Neural Regression, Representational Similarity, Model Zoology & Neural Taskonomy at Scale in Rodent Visual Cortex
Conwell, C.; Mayo, D.; Katz, B.; Buice, M. A.; Alvarez, G. A.; Barbu, A.
Show abstract
How well do deep neural networks fare as models of mouse visual cortex? A majority of research to date suggests results far more mixed than those produced in the modeling of primate visual cortex. Here, we perform a large-scale benchmarking of dozens of deep neural network models in mouse visual cortex with both representational similarity analysis and neural regression. Using the Allen Brain Observatorys 2-photon calcium-imaging dataset of activity in over 6,000 reliable rodent visual cortical neurons recorded in response to natural scenes, we replicate previous findings and resolve previous discrepancies, ultimately demonstrating that modern neural networks can in fact be used to explain activity in the mouse visual cortex to a more reasonable degree than previously suggested. Using our benchmark as an atlas, we offer preliminary answers to overarching questions about levels of analysis (e.g. do models that better predict the representations of individual neurons also predict representational similarity across neural populations?); questions about the properties of models that best predict the visual system overall (e.g. is convolution or category-supervision necessary to better predict neural activity?); and questions about the mapping between biological and artificial representations (e.g. does the information processing hierarchy in deep nets match the anatomical hierarchy of mouse visual cortex?). Along the way, we catalogue a number of models (including vision transformers, MLP-Mixers, normalization free networks, Taskonomy encoders and self-supervised models) outside the traditional circuit of convolutional object recognition. Taken together, our results provide a reference point for future ventures in the deep neural network modeling of mouse visual cortex, hinting at novel combinations of mapping method, architecture, and task to more fully characterize the computational motifs of visual representation in a species so central to neuroscience, but with a perceptual physiology and ecology markedly different from the ones we study in primates.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- CNN MouseNet: A biologically constrained convolutional neural network model for mouse visual cortex 97%
- Increasing neural network robustness improves match to macaque V1 eigenspectrum, spatial frequency preference and predictivity 97%
- Learning probability distributions of sensory inputswith Monte Carlo Predictive Coding 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Orthogonal Representations of Object Shape and Category in Deep Convolutional Neural Networks and Human Visual Cortex 94%
- Generalising uncertainty improves accuracy and safety of deep learning analytics applied to oncology 94%
- Overcoming the limitations of motion sensor models by considering dendritic computations 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.