Back

Effectiveness of Tocilizumab, Sarilumab, and Anakinra for critically ill patients with COVID-19 The REMAP-CAP COVID-19 Immune Modulation Therapy Domain Randomized Clinical Trial

Derde, L. P. G.; The REMAP-CAP Investigators,

2021-06-22 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2021.06.18.21259133 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUNDThe interleukin-6 receptor antagonist tocilizumab improves outcomes in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the effectiveness of other immune modulating agents is unclear. METHODSWe evaluated four immunomodulatory agents in an ongoing international, multifactorial, adaptive platform trial. Adult participants with COVID-19 were randomized to receive tocilizumab, sarilumab, anakinra, or standard care (control). In addition, a small group (n=21) of participants were randomized to interferon-{beta}1a. The primary outcome was an ordinal scale combining in-hospital mortality (assigned -1) and days free of organ support to day 21. The trial used a Bayesian statistical model with pre-defined triggers for superiority, equivalence or futility. RESULTSStatistical triggers for equivalence between tocilizumab and sarilumab; and for inferiority of anakinra to the other active interventions were met at a planned adaptive analysis. Of the 2274 critically ill participants enrolled, 972 were assigned to tocilizumab, 485 to sarilumab, 378 to anakinra and 418 to control. Median organ support-free days were 7 (interquartile range [IQR] -1, 16), 9 (IQR -1, 17), 0 (IQR -1, 15) and 0 (IQR -1, 15) for tocilizumab, sarilumab, anakinra and control, respectively. Median adjusted odds ratios were 1.46 (95%CrI 1.13, 1.87), 1.50 (95%CrI 1.13, 2.00), and 0.99 (95%CrI 0.74, 1.35) for tocilizumab, sarilumab and anakinra, yielding 99.8%, 99.8% and 46.6% posterior probabilities of superiority, respectively, compared to control. Median adjusted odds ratios for hospital survival were 1.42 (95%CrI 1.05,1.93), 1.51 (95%CrI 1.06, 2.20) and 0.97 (95%CrI 0.66, 1.40) for tocilizumab, sarilumab and anakinra respectively, compared to control, yielding 98.8%, 98.8% and 43.6% posterior probabilities of superiority, respectively, compared to control. All treatments appeared safe. CONCLUSIONSIn patients with severe COVID-19 receiving organ support, tocilizumab and sarilumab are similarly effective at improving survival and reducing duration of organ support. Anakinra is not effective in this population. (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02735707)

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.3%
2
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
3
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.7%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.7%
6
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
7
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
8
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
9
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
10
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
11
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
12
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
14
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
15
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.1%
17
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
18
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
19
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
27
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
28
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.7%
29
Life
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
30
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%