Back

Fast and powerful statistical method for context-specific QTL mapping in multi-context genomic studies

Lu, A.; Thompson, M.; Gordon, M. G.; Dahl, A.; Ye, C. J.; Zaitlen, N.; Balliu, B.

2021-06-18 genomics
10.1101/2021.06.17.448889 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Context-specific eQTLs mediate genetic risk for complex diseases. However, limitations in current methods for identifying these eQTLs have hindered their comprehensive characterization and downstream interpretation of disease-associated variants. Here, we introduce FastGxC, a method to efficiently and powerfully map context-specific eQTLs by leveraging the correlation structure in genomic studies with repeated sampling, e.g., single-cell RNA-seq studies. Using simulations, we demonstrate that FastGxC is up to nine times more powerful and 106 times faster than existing approaches, reducing computation time from years to minutes. We applied FastGxC to bulk multi-tissue (N=698) and single-cell PBMC (N=1,218) RNA-seq datasets, generating comprehensive tissue- and cell-type-specific eQTL maps. These eQTLs exhibited up to four-fold enrichment in open chromatin regions from matched contexts and were twice as enriched as standard context-specific eQTLs, highlighting their biological relevance. Furthermore, we examined the relationship between context-specific eQTLs and complex human traits and diseases. FastGxC improved precision in identifying relevant contexts for each trait by three-fold and expanded candidate causal genes by 25% in cell types and 6% in tissues compared to standard eQTLs. In summary, FastGxC provides a powerful framework for mapping context-specific eQTLs, advancing our understanding of gene regulatory mechanisms underlying complex human traits and diseases.

Published in Cell Genomics (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.