Glial AP1 promotes early TBI recovery but chronically drives tauopathy
Byrns, C. N.; Bonini, N. M.; Saikumar, J.
Show abstract
The emergence of degenerative disease after traumatic brain injury is often described as an acceleration of normal age-related processes. Whether similar molecular processes occur in injury and in age is unclear. Here we identify a functionally dynamic and lasting transcriptional response in glia, mediated by the conserved transcription factor AP1. In the early post-TBI period, glial AP1 is essential for recovery, ensuring brain integrity and animal survival. In sharp contrast, chronic AP1 activation promotes human tau pathology, tissue loss, and mortality. We show a similar process activates in healthy brains with age. Importantly, AP1 activity is present in moderate human TBI, decades after injury, and associates with microglial activation and tauopathy. Our data provide key molecular insight into glia, highlighting that the same molecular process drives dynamic and contradictory glia behavior in TBI, first acting to protect but chronically promoting disease.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Impaired bidirectional communication between interneurons and oligodendrocyte precursor cells affects cognitive behavior 97%
- In situ architecture of neuronal alpha-Synuclein inclusions 97%
- Accelerated cognitive decline in obese mouse model of Alzheimer's disease is linked to sialic acid-driven immune deregulation 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-nucleus sequencing reveals enriched expression of genetic risk factors in Extratelencephalic Neurons sensitive to degeneration in ALS 97%
- Chromatin accessibility dynamics of neurogenic niche cells reveal defects in neural stem stem cell adhesion and migration during aging 97%
- Activation of innate immune cGAS-STING pathway contributes to Alzheimer pathogenesis in 5xFAD mice 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.