Back

The development and usability testing of two arts-based knowledge translation tools for pediatric procedural pain

Le, A.; Hartling, L.; Scott, S. D.

2021-06-22 pediatrics
10.1101/2021.06.17.21259118 medRxiv
Show abstract

Procedures carried out in acute care settings, such as emergency departments (EDs), are among the most common sources of acute pain experienced by children. Such procedures may include intravenous insertions (IVs), venipuncture, and wound irrigation and repair. Inadequately managed procedural pain can cause negative short-term and long-term implications for children, ranging from anxiety to aversion to healthcare. Parents have repeatedly expressed that they do not have the necessary tools to comfort or distract their child during uncomfortable medical procedures. As such, the purpose of this study was to work with parents to develop and evaluate two digital tools for pediatric procedural pain. A whiteboard animation video and interactive infographic were developed following a systematic review and interview with parents. Prototypes were tested in five ED waiting rooms in two Canadian provinces. Sites included those in urban, rural, and remote settings. Overall, parents rated the tools highly, suggesting that engaging with parents to develop arts-based digital tools is a highly effective method in ensuring that parents can understand and utilize complex health information. Author ContributionsThis study was conducted under the supervision of Drs. Shannon D. Scott (SDS) and Lisa Hartling (LH), PIs for translation Evidence in Child Health to enhance Outcomes (ECHO) Research and the Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence (ARCHE), respectively. Both PIs designed the research study and obtained research funding through Translating Emergency Knowledge for Kids (TREKK) Networks of Centres of Excellence of Canada (NCE). SDS designed and supervised all aspects of tool development and evaluation. LH co-designed and supervised the qualitative study involving interviews with parents and systematic review of parent experiences and information needs. Tony An developed the infographic. Kassi Shave conducted and analyzed qualitative interviews with parents. Anne Le (AL) conducted usability testing. AL analyzed usability data. All authors contributed to the writing of this technical report and provided substantial feedback. This work was funded by: Networks of Centres of ExcellenceO_LIKlassen, T., Hartling, L., Jabbour, M., Johnson, D., & Scott, S.D. (2015). Translating emergency knowledge for kids (TREKK). Networks of Centres of Excellence of Canada Knowledge Mobilization Renewal ($1,200,000). January 2016 - December 2019. C_LI Women and Childrens Health Research Institute (WCHRI)O_LIScott, S.D & Hartling L. (2016). Translating Emergency Knowledge for Kids renewal. Women and Childrens Health Research Institute (matched dollars, $150,000). April 2016 - December 2019. C_LI This report should be cited asLe, A., Hartling, L., Scott, S.D. (2021). The development and usability testing of two arts-based knowledge translation tools for pediatric procedural pain. Technical Report. ECHO Research, University of Alberta. Available at: http://www.echokt.ca/research/technical-reports/

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.4%
2
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.7%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.4%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
6
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
7
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.2%
8
Ear & Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
9
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
10
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
13
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
14
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
15
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
17
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
20
Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
21
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
Public Health Nutrition
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
23
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
25
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
26
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%