The development and usability testing of two arts-based knowledge translation tools for pediatric procedural pain
Le, A.; Hartling, L.; Scott, S. D.
Show abstract
Procedures carried out in acute care settings, such as emergency departments (EDs), are among the most common sources of acute pain experienced by children. Such procedures may include intravenous insertions (IVs), venipuncture, and wound irrigation and repair. Inadequately managed procedural pain can cause negative short-term and long-term implications for children, ranging from anxiety to aversion to healthcare. Parents have repeatedly expressed that they do not have the necessary tools to comfort or distract their child during uncomfortable medical procedures. As such, the purpose of this study was to work with parents to develop and evaluate two digital tools for pediatric procedural pain. A whiteboard animation video and interactive infographic were developed following a systematic review and interview with parents. Prototypes were tested in five ED waiting rooms in two Canadian provinces. Sites included those in urban, rural, and remote settings. Overall, parents rated the tools highly, suggesting that engaging with parents to develop arts-based digital tools is a highly effective method in ensuring that parents can understand and utilize complex health information. Author ContributionsThis study was conducted under the supervision of Drs. Shannon D. Scott (SDS) and Lisa Hartling (LH), PIs for translation Evidence in Child Health to enhance Outcomes (ECHO) Research and the Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence (ARCHE), respectively. Both PIs designed the research study and obtained research funding through Translating Emergency Knowledge for Kids (TREKK) Networks of Centres of Excellence of Canada (NCE). SDS designed and supervised all aspects of tool development and evaluation. LH co-designed and supervised the qualitative study involving interviews with parents and systematic review of parent experiences and information needs. Tony An developed the infographic. Kassi Shave conducted and analyzed qualitative interviews with parents. Anne Le (AL) conducted usability testing. AL analyzed usability data. All authors contributed to the writing of this technical report and provided substantial feedback. This work was funded by: Networks of Centres of ExcellenceO_LIKlassen, T., Hartling, L., Jabbour, M., Johnson, D., & Scott, S.D. (2015). Translating emergency knowledge for kids (TREKK). Networks of Centres of Excellence of Canada Knowledge Mobilization Renewal ($1,200,000). January 2016 - December 2019. C_LI Women and Childrens Health Research Institute (WCHRI)O_LIScott, S.D & Hartling L. (2016). Translating Emergency Knowledge for Kids renewal. Women and Childrens Health Research Institute (matched dollars, $150,000). April 2016 - December 2019. C_LI This report should be cited asLe, A., Hartling, L., Scott, S.D. (2021). The development and usability testing of two arts-based knowledge translation tools for pediatric procedural pain. Technical Report. ECHO Research, University of Alberta. Available at: http://www.echokt.ca/research/technical-reports/
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 94%
- A comparison of self-triage tools to nurse driven triage in the emergency department 94%
- Pain Expectations, Experiences and Coping Strategies Used By Post-operative Patients: A Descriptive Phenomelogical Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mobile Phone Virtual Reality Game for Pediatric Home Burn Dressing Pain Management, a Randomized Clinical Trial 96%
- Improving cardiovascular health in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: Development of the Cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with aneurysms (CRISP) behaviour change intervention 92%
- The MultimorbiditY COllaborative Medication Review And DEcision Making (MyComrade) study: A protocol for a cross-border pilot cluster randomised controlled trial 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 93%
- Developing contents for a digital drug adherence tool with reminder cues and personalized feedback: a formative mixed-methods study among children and adolescents living with HIV in Tanzania 93%
- Use of assistive technology to assess distal motor function in subjects with neuromuscular disease 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Doctors of chiropractic working with or within integrated health care delivery systems: a scoping review protocol 94%
- Guided relaxation-based virtual reality versus distraction-based virtual reality or passive control for postoperative pain management in children and adolescents undergoing Nuss repair of pectus excavatum: protocol for a prospective, randomized, controlled trial (FOREVR Peds trial) 94%
- A mixed methods study protocol to develop and pilot a Competency Assessment Tool to support therapists in the care of patients with blunt CHest trauma (CATCh Study) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- How young people experienced Long COVID services: a qualitative analysis 92%
- The quantified baby: real-world use of infant sleep monitoring technologies and its impact on parent mental health and medical decision-making 91%
- Is it time to ACT? A qualitative study of the acceptability and feasibility of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for adolescents with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.