Differential expression of glycosyltransferases identified through comprehensive pan-cancer analysis
Dingerdissen, H. M.; Vora, J.; Cauley, E.; Bell, A.; King, C. H.; Mazumder, R.
Show abstract
Despite accumulating evidence supporting a role for glycosylation in cancer progression and prognosis, the complexity of the human glycome and glycoproteome poses many challenges to understanding glycosylation-related events in cancer. In this study, a multifaceted genomics approach was applied to analyze the impact of differential expression of glycosyltransferases (GTs) in 16 cancers. An enzyme list was compiled and curated from numerous resources to create a consensus set of GTs. Resulting enzymes were analyzed for differential expression in cancer, and findings were integrated with experimental evidence from other analyses, including: similarity of healthy expression patterns across orthologous genes, miRNA expression, automatically-mined literature, curation of known cancer biomarkers, N-glycosylation impact, and survival analysis. The resulting list of GTs comprises 222 human enzymes based on annotations from five databases, 84 of which were differentially expressed in more than five cancers, and 14 of which were observed with the same direction of expression change across all implicated cancers. 25 high-value GT candidates were identified by cross-referencing multimodal analysis results, including PYGM, FUT6 and additional fucosyltransferases, several UDP-glucuronosyltransferases, and others, and are suggested for prioritization in future cancer biomarker studies. Relevant findings are available through OncoMX at https://data.oncomx.org, and the overarching pipeline can be used as a framework for similarly analysis across diverse evidence types in cancer. This work is expected to improve the understanding of glycosylation in cancer by transparently defining the space of glycosyltransferase enzymes and harmonizing variable experimental data to enable improved generation of data-driven cancer biomarker hypotheses.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- BioLitMine: advanced mining of biomedical and biological literature about human genes and genes from major model organisms 91%
- A genome-wide screen in mice to identify cell-extrinsic regulators of pulmonary metastatic colonisation 91%
- Regeneration Rosetta: An interactive web application to explore regeneration-associated gene expression and chromatin accessibility 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Equivalent Change Enrichment Analysis: Assessing Equivalent and Inverse Change in Biological Pathways between Diverse Experiments 91%
- Using Published Pathway Figures in Enrichment Analysis and Machine Learning 91%
- Rapid Single Cell Evaluation of Human Disease and Disorder Targets Using REVEAL: SingleCell™ 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A comprehensive algorithmic dissection yields biomarker discovery and insights into the discrete stage-wise progression of colorectal cancer 95%
- Evolutionary Inference Predicts Novel ACE2 Protein Interactions Relevant to COVID-19 Pathologies 94%
- Novel Driver Strength Index highlights important cancer genes in TCGA PanCanAtlas patients 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- INSISTC: Incorporating Network Structure Information for Single-Cell Type Classification 90%
- Minimum Error Calibration and Normalization for Genomic Copy Number Analysis 90%
- Principal component analysis- and tensor decomposition-based unsupervised feature extraction to select more reasonable differentially methylated cytosines: Optimization of standard deviation versus state-of-the-art methods 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.