Tocilizumab in COVID-19 - A Bayesian reanalysis of RECOVERY
Albuquerque, A. M.; Tramujas, L.; Sewanan, L. R.; Brophy, J. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundRandomised Evaluation of COVID-19 Therapy (RECOVERY) demonstrated that tocilizumab reduces mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. However, substantial uncertainty remains whether tocilizumabs effect is similar across clinically relevant subgroups. Whether this uncertainty can be resolved with Bayesian methods is unknown. Design, Setting, Participants, and InterventionsRECOVERY was a controlled, open-label, platform UK trial that randomized (1:1) 4116 adults with oxygen saturation <92% on room air or receiving oxygen therapy with C-reactive protein [≥]75 mg/L to either usual care or tocilizumab plus usual care. Main outcome measuresMortality and hospital discharge within 28 days. MethodsUsing Bayesian methods, we combined RECOVERY with evidence-based priors in-corporating previous COVID-19 tocilizumab RCTs. The probability of tocilizumabs benefit for respiratory support and corticosteroid subgroups and sensitivity analyses were performed with different prior distributions and baseline risks. ResultsFor all-cause mortality, the posterior probabilities of decreased deaths with tocilizumab were >99% and 19% in patients using and not using corticosteroids, respectively. In patients on simple oxygen only, non-invasive ventilation and invasive mechanical ventilation, the probabilities of decreased mortality were 96%, >99% and 77%, respectively. The probabilities for a clinically significant mortality reduction, as assessed by an absolute risk difference > 3% (number needed to treat [≤] 33), were 77%, 96%, 56%, respectively. Sensitivity analyses highlighted the uncertainty and lack of conclusive evidence for tocilizumabs effect in patients on invasive mechanical ventilation and those without concurrent corticosteroids. Posterior probabilities of benefit for hospital discharge outcome were high and consistent across most subgroups. ConclusionsIn this Bayesian reanalysis, COVID-19 hospitalized patients exposed to corticosteroids or on non-invasive ventilation have a high probability of a clinically meaningful mortality benefit from tocilizumab. Tocilizumab also likely improves discharge from hospital in most subgroups. Future research should further address if patients on invasive mechanical ventilation can also benefit from tocilizumab.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 94%
- A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Sarilumab in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19 91%
- A Multi-center, Prospective, Observational-cohort controlled study of Clinical Outcomes following COVID-19 Convalescent plasma therapy in hospitalized COVID-19 patients 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Colchicine use in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- Hydroxychloroquine/Chloroquine for the Treatment of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis 93%
- Can we predict the severe course of COVID-19 – a systematic review and meta-analysis of indicators of clinical outcome? 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Oral clarithromycin in COVID-19 of moderate severity: the ACHIEVE open-label trial using concurrent matched comparators 91%
- Combination Of Tocilizumab And Steroids To Improve Mortality In Patients With Severe COVID-19 Infection: A Spanish, Multicenter, Cohort Study 90%
- The efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine in COVID19 patients : a multicenter national retrospective cohort 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A systematic review of Anakinra, Sarilumab, Siltuximab with meta-analysis of Tocilizumab for Covid-19 95%
- Early Lenzilumab Treatment Of COVID-19 Patients Using C-Reactive Protein As A Biomarker Improves Efficacy: Results From The Phase 3 ‘Live-Air’ Trial 93%
- Post-viral parenchymal lung disease following COVID-19 and viral pneumonitis hospitalisation: A systematic review and meta-analysis 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.