Normative modeling of neuroimaging data using generalized additive models of location scale and shape
Dinga, R.; Fraza, C. J.; Bayer, J. M. M.; Kia, S. M.; Beckmann, C. F.; Marquand, A. F.
Show abstract
Normative modeling aims to quantify the degree to which an individuals brain deviates from a reference sample with respect to one or more variables, which can be used as a potential biomarker of a healthy brain and as a tool to study heterogeneity of psychiatric disorders. The application of normative models is hindered by methodological challenges and lacks standards for the usage and evaluation of normative models. In this paper, we present generalized additive models for location scale and shape (GAMLSS) for normative modeling of neuroimaging data, a flexible modeling framework that can model heteroskedasticity, non-linear effects of variables, and hierarchical structure of the data. It can model non-Gaussian distributions, and it allows for an automatic model order selection, thus improving the accuracy of normative models while mitigating problems of overfitting. Furthermore, we describe measures and diagnostic tools suitable for evaluating normative models and step-by-step examples of normative modeling, including fitting several candidate models, selecting the best models, and transferring them to new scan sites.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantifying uncertainty in brain-predicted age using scalar-on-image quantile regression 96%
- Accommodating site variation in neuroimaging data using normative and hierarchical Bayesian models 95%
- Voxel-wise and spatial modelling of binary lesion masks: Comparison of methods with a realistic simulation framework 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Extended Invariant Information Clustering is Effective for Leave-One- Site-Out Cross-Validation in Resting State Functional Connectivity Modelling 93%
- Evidence for the null hypothesis in functional magnetic resonance imaging using group-level Bayesian inference 93%
- NeuroRA: A Python Toolbox of Representational Analysis from Multi-modal Neural Data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using extreme value statistics to reconceptualize psychopathology as extreme deviations from a normative reference model 97%
- SAN: mitigating spatial covariance heterogeneity in cortical thickness data collected from multiple scanners or sites 94%
- DeepComBat: A Statistically Motivated, Hyperparameter-Robust, Deep Learning Approach to Harmonization of Neuroimaging Data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.