Quarantine and testing strategies to reduce transmission risk from imported SARS-CoV-2 infections: a global modelling study
Quilty, B. J.; Russell, T. W.; Clifford, S.; Flasche, S.; Pickering, S.; Neil, S. J.; Galao, R. P.; Edmunds, W. J.; CMMID COVID-19 Working Group,
Show abstract
BackgroundMany countries require incoming air travellers to quarantine on arrival and/or undergo testing to limit importation of SARS-CoV-2. MethodsWe developed mathematical models of SARS-CoV-2 viral load trajectories over the course of infection to assess the effectiveness of quarantine and testing strategies. We consider the utility of pre and post-flight Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and lateral flow testing (LFT) to reduce transmission risk from infected arrivals and to reduce the duration of, or replace, quarantine. We also estimate the effect of each strategy relative to domestic incidence, and limits of achievable risk reduction, for 99 countries where flight data and case numbers are estimated. ResultsWe find that LFTs immediately pre-flight are more effective than PCR tests 3 days before departure in decreasing the number of departing infectious travellers. Pre-flight LFTs and post-flight quarantines, with tests to release, may prevent the majority of transmission from infectious arrivals while reducing the required duration of quarantine; a pre-flight LFT followed by 5 days in quarantine with a test to release would reduce the expected number of secondary cases generated by an infected traveller compared to symptomatic self-isolation alone, Rs, by 85% (95% UI: 74%, 96%) for PCR and 85% (95% UI: 70%, 96%) for LFT, even assuming imperfect adherence to quarantine (28% of individuals) and self-isolation following a positive test (86%). Under the same adherence assumptions, 5 days of daily LFT testing would reduce Rs by 91% (95% UI: 75%, 98%). ConclusionsStrategies aimed at reducing the risk of imported cases should be considered with respect to: domestic incidence, transmission, and susceptibility; measures in place to support quarantining travellers; and incidence of new variants of concern in travellers origin countries. Daily testing with LFTs for 5 days is comparable to 5 days of quarantine with a test on exit or 14 days with no test.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Temporal variations in international air travel: implications for modelling the spread of infectious diseases 96%
- International risk of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant importations originating in South Africa 95%
- Mitigating norovirus spread on cruise ships: A model-based assessment of diagnostic timing and isolation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Reducing travel-related SARS-CoV-2 transmission with layered mitigation measures: Symptom monitoring, quarantine, and testing 96%
- Comparison of infection control strategies to reduce COVID-19 outbreaks in homeless shelters in the United States: a simulation study 94%
- Projecting vaccine demand and impact for emerging zoonotic pathogens 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.