Back

Quarantine and testing strategies to reduce transmission risk from imported SARS-CoV-2 infections: a global modelling study

Quilty, B. J.; Russell, T. W.; Clifford, S.; Flasche, S.; Pickering, S.; Neil, S. J.; Galao, R. P.; Edmunds, W. J.; CMMID COVID-19 Working Group,

2021-06-14 epidemiology
10.1101/2021.06.11.21258735 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMany countries require incoming air travellers to quarantine on arrival and/or undergo testing to limit importation of SARS-CoV-2. MethodsWe developed mathematical models of SARS-CoV-2 viral load trajectories over the course of infection to assess the effectiveness of quarantine and testing strategies. We consider the utility of pre and post-flight Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) and lateral flow testing (LFT) to reduce transmission risk from infected arrivals and to reduce the duration of, or replace, quarantine. We also estimate the effect of each strategy relative to domestic incidence, and limits of achievable risk reduction, for 99 countries where flight data and case numbers are estimated. ResultsWe find that LFTs immediately pre-flight are more effective than PCR tests 3 days before departure in decreasing the number of departing infectious travellers. Pre-flight LFTs and post-flight quarantines, with tests to release, may prevent the majority of transmission from infectious arrivals while reducing the required duration of quarantine; a pre-flight LFT followed by 5 days in quarantine with a test to release would reduce the expected number of secondary cases generated by an infected traveller compared to symptomatic self-isolation alone, Rs, by 85% (95% UI: 74%, 96%) for PCR and 85% (95% UI: 70%, 96%) for LFT, even assuming imperfect adherence to quarantine (28% of individuals) and self-isolation following a positive test (86%). Under the same adherence assumptions, 5 days of daily LFT testing would reduce Rs by 91% (95% UI: 75%, 98%). ConclusionsStrategies aimed at reducing the risk of imported cases should be considered with respect to: domestic incidence, transmission, and susceptibility; measures in place to support quarantining travellers; and incidence of new variants of concern in travellers origin countries. Daily testing with LFTs for 5 days is comparable to 5 days of quarantine with a test on exit or 14 days with no test.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Travel Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
40.0%
2
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.9%
3
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
4
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
6
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.1%
8
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.5%
10
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
11
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
12
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.2%
13
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.2%
14
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
15
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
16
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
17
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Swiss Medical Weekly
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
21
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
26
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
28
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%