Back

Relative perceived importance of different settings for SARS-CoV2 acquisition in England and Wales: Analysis of the Virus Watch Community Cohort

Beale, S.; Byrne, T. E.; Fragaszy, E. B.; Kovar, J.; Nguyen, V. G.; Aryee, A.; Fong, W. L. E.; Geismar, C. R.; Patel, P.; Shrotri, M.; Patni, N.; Braithwaite, I.; Navaratnam, A. M. D.; Aldridge, R. W.; Hayward, A. C.

2021-06-16 public and global health
10.1101/2021.06.11.21258730 medRxiv
Show abstract

We aimed to assess the relative importance of different settings for SARS-CoV2 transmission in a large community cohort. We demonstrate the importance of home, work and education as venues for transmission. In children, education was most important and in older adults essential shopping was of high importance. Our findings support public health messaging about infection control at home, advice on working from home and restrictions in different venues.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Public Health
○ 158 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.2%
Similar papers in this journal
2
BMJ Open
● 601 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
18.7%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Public Health
○ 36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
Similar papers in this journal
4
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.9%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
5
Epidemiology and Infection
◐ 89 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
Similar papers in this journal
6
BMJ Public Health
● 25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
7
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
● 34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
8
The Lancet Public Health
○ 20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
9
Eurosurveillance
● 83 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
10
Epidemics
○ 116 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
11
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
○ 73 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
12
BMC Infectious Diseases
○ 133 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
○ 33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
◐ 142 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
International Journal of Public Health
○ 18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
16
Emerging Infectious Diseases
● 105 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Journal of Public Health
◐ 24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
18
PLOS Global Public Health
● 344 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
19
Wellcome Open Research
○ 67 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
PLOS Medicine
● 110 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
22
European Journal of Epidemiology
○ 43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
23
F1000Research
○ 88 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
24
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
○ 62 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.