The Consciousness Theories Studies (ConTraSt) database: analyzing and comparing empirical studies of consciousness theories
Yaron, I.; Melloni, L.; Pitts, M.; Mudrik, L.
Show abstract
Understanding how consciousness arises from neural activity remains one of the biggest challenges for neuroscience. Numerous theories have been proposed in recent years, each gaining independent empirical support. Currently, there is no comprehensive, quantitative and theory-neutral overview of the field that enables an evaluation of how theoretical frameworks interact with empirical research. We provide a birds eye view on studies that interpreted their findings in light of at least one of four leading neuroscientific theories of consciousness (N=412 experiments), asking how methodological choices of the researchers might affect the final conclusions. We found that supporting a specific theory can be predicted solely from methodological choices, irrespective of findings. Furthermore, most studies interpret their findings post-hoc, rather than a-priori testing critical predictions of the theories. Our results highlight challenges for the field and provide researchers with a unique, open-access website to further analyze trends in the neuroscience of consciousness.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Synergistic Workspace for Human Consciousness Revealed by Integrated Information Decomposition 94%
- Trends in Self-citation Rates in High-impact Neurology, Neuroscience, and Psychiatry Journals 93%
- No effect of additional education on long-term brain structure: a preregistered natural experiment in thousands of individuals. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.