Back

A landscape model for cell fate decisions during mesoendoderm differentiation in C. elegans based on Wnt dynamics

Chang, S.-S.; Bao, Z.; Siggia, E.

2021-06-09 developmental biology
10.1101/2021.06.09.447780 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Geometric models allow us to quantify topography of the Waddington landscape and gain quantitative insights of gene interaction in cell fate differentiation. Often mutant phenotypes show partial penetrance and there is a dearth of quantitative models that can exploit this data and make predictions about new allelic combinations with no additional parameters. C. elegans with its invariant cell lineages has been a key model system for discovering the genes controlling development. Here we focus on the differentiation of the endoderm founder cell named E from its mother, the EMS cell. Mutants that convert E to its sister MS fate have figured prominently in deciphering the Wnt pathway in worm. We construct a bi-valued Waddington landscape model that predicts the effect on POP-1/TCF and SYS-1/beta-catenin levels based on the penetrance of mutant alleles and RNAi, and relates the levels to fate choice decisions. A subset of the available data is used to fit the model and remaining data is then correctly predicted. Simple kinetic arguments show that contrary to current belief the ratio of these two proteins alone is not indicative of fate outcomes. Furthermore, double mutants within a background reduction of POP-1 levels are predicted with no adjustable parameters and their relative penetrance can differ from the same mutants with the wild-type POP-1 level, which calls for further experimental investigations. Our model refines the content of existing gene networks and invites extensions to other manifestations of the Wnt pathway in worm.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
38.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.3%
3
BioSystems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
5
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.6%
6
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
7
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
8
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
9
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.5%
12
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
13
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
14
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
15
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
16
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
17
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
19
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
23
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
24
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
25
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
26
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.5%
27
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
28
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%
29
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%