The role of nature conservation and commercial farming in psychological distress among rural Ugandans
Pienkowski, T.; Keane, A.; Kinyanda, E.; Knizek, B. L.; Asiimwe, C.; Muhanguzi, G.; Milner-Gulland, E. J.
Show abstract
Mental illness is a leading contributor to the global burden of disease, but there is limited understanding of how it is influenced by socio-ecological context, particularly in the global south. We asked how interactions with ecological systems influence stressors associated with psychological distress in a rural Ugandan case study. We conducted and thematically analyzed 45 semi-structured interviews with residents of Nyabyeya Parish, Masindi District. Our results suggest that poverty and food insecurity were the primary reported causes of "thinking too much" and related idioms of psychological distress. The expansion of commercial agriculture may have been associated with the contraction of subsistence farming, reportedly exacerbating poverty and food insecurity among poorer households but contributing incomes to wealthier ones. Furthermore, households bordering a conservation area reported that crop losses from wildlife contributed to food insecurity. However, forest resources were important safety nets for those facing poverty and food insecurity. Our study suggests how two globally prevalent land uses - commercial agriculture and nature conservation - may influence social determinants of psychological distress in our study area. Psychological distress does not necessarily imply mental disorder. Nonetheless, exploring socially-mediated interactions with ecosystems may help explain the etiology of psychological distress. Furthermore, we suggest opportunities to manage socio-ecological systems to support mental health, such as promoting equitable access and control of livelihood resources. We also highlight co-benefits and trade-offs between global sustainability goals that could be managed for mental health, and why these should be recognized in the anticipated New Deal for Nature. HighlightsO_LIFood insecurity and poverty were major stressors reportedly causing psychological distress, characterized as "thinking too much." C_LIO_LIComplex interactions between conservation, commercial agriculture, and poverty influenced psychological distress. C_LIO_LICommercial agriculture displaced subsistence farming, exacerbating poverty and food security among poorer households. C_LIO_LIConserved forests were both home to crop-raiding wildlife and sources of income and food, affecting poverty and food insecurity. C_LIO_LIMental health needs to be included in assessments of the role of the ecosystems in public health. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Methodological priorities in assessing wild edible plant knowledge and use: a case study among the Baka in Cameroon. 93%
- Everything Under Control? Comparing Knepp Estate rewilding project with 'traditional nature conservation 93%
- Climate Resilience Index as a tool to explore households’ resilience to climate change-induced shocks in Dinki watershed, central highlands of Ethiopia Households’ resilience to climate change impacts 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Insights from two decades of the Student Conference on Conservation Science 92%
- Spatial factors predict variation in reports of human-wildlife interactions but not public attitudes towards a widespread urban carnivore, the red fox 92%
- Myanmar's terrestrial ecosystems: status, threats and conservation opportunities 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Pastoral (im)mobility and zoonotic disease: a qualitative participatory study in Plateau State, Nigeria 95%
- Climate change, livelihoods, gender and violence in Rukiga, Uganda: intersections and pathways 93%
- Native American Resilience to Protect Family Nutrition During a Pandemic: A Qualitative Analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.